(175d) The Cascade Reaction of Ethanol to Butadiene over Silica-Supported Silver-Zirconia Catalysts
AIChE Annual Meeting
2020
2020 Virtual AIChE Annual Meeting
Catalysis and Reaction Engineering Division
Biomass Upgrading III: Small Oxygenates
Wednesday, November 18, 2020 - 8:45am to 9:00am
Silver and zirconia supported on silica is known to be one of the most effective catalysts for the cascade reaction of ethanol to butadiene, also known as the Lebedev reaction. The reaction includes the dehydrogenation of ethanol to acetaldehyde, condensation of acetaldehyde, and appropriate hydrogenation and dehydration reactions to ultimately produce butadiene. This work focused on studying the role of each component (Ag and ZrO2, respectively) in the Lebedev reaction by modifying the crystallinity of ZrO2 and the ratio of Ag to ZrO2 in the reactor. Characterization of the catalysts was accomplished using X-ray diffraction, X-ray absorption spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, electron microscopy, and diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) of adsorbed COand CO2. All of the characterization methods were consistent with silica-supported zirconia catalysts presenting the ZrO2 component in a very highly dispersed phase. Zirconia catalysts, either in bulk (crystalline) or supported (amorphous) forms converted ethanol at 573 K to mostly undesired dehydration products, diethyl ether and ethylene, when Ag was not present. The addition of Ag to bulk ZrO2 favored the production of acetaldehyde (presumably from the Ag component) without forming an appreciable amount of butadiene (<5%), whereas placing Ag together with silica-supported ZrO2 exhibited a selectivity of ~35% to butadiene at an ethanol conversion of 20%. The observed change in product distribution dependent on the ratio of Ag to ZrO2 in the catalyst bed revealed the delicate balance required between the dehydrogenation/hydrogenation function provided by Ag and the acidic/basic function provided by ZrO2. The spectral features from in situ DRIFTS of adsorbed CO and CO2, used to probe surface Lewis acid and base sites, respectively, may explain the differences in catalytic performance between bulk and supported ZrO2.