(342p) Comparative Study of Methods for Optimal Scheduling of Centralized Chilled Water Plants Under Forecast Uncertainty
AIChE Annual Meeting
2020
2020 Virtual AIChE Annual Meeting
Computing and Systems Technology Division
Interactive Session: Systems and Process Operations
Friday, November 20, 2020 - 8:00am to 9:00am
Approaches for handling uncertainty in scheduling problems may be classified as either reactive, in which a corrective action is taken only after the realization of the uncertain event, or preventive, in which the uncertainty is modeled explicitly and actions are taken before its realization (Li and Ierapetritou, 2008). Preventive approaches typically make use of one of three techniques: (i) chance-constrained optimization, which minimizes the probability of violating certain constraints; (ii) stagewise stochastic programming, which optimizes the expectation with respect to the uncertain parameters and allows for recourse decisions; and (iii) robust optimization, which only requires uncertainty bounds and typically results in a conservative worst-case solution. As outlined by Mesbah (2016), recent literature on optimal scheduling and control of central cooling plants under forecast uncertainty has mainly focused on a chance constrained approach (Ma et al, 2014, Oldewurtel et al, 2014).
In the present work we perform a comparative study of the different approaches for optimal scheduling of central chiller plants under forecast uncertainty: stagewise stochastic programming, chance-constrained programming, and robust optimization. We propose model formulations for each strategy and demonstrate the advantages and drawbacks of each method. Furthermore, we analyze how the different strategies can complement each other and show how the choice of parameters affect the final equipment sequencing result. The study is performed with real data from the central chilled water plant from the University of California, Davis, which comprises a battery of large-scale centrifugal chillers, a large-scale TES (Thermal Energy Storage) tank and participates in the Day-Ahead electricity market from CAISO (California Independent System Operator).
References
ASHRAE (American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, & Air-Conditioning Engineers). (2016). ASHRAE HVAC Systems & Equipment Handbook.
EIA (Energy Information Administration). (2019) Annual Energy Outlook 2019.
Li, Z., Ierapetritou, M. G. (2008). Process scheduling under uncertainty: Review and challenges. Computers & Chemical Engineering 32, 4â5, pp. 715-727.
Ma, Y., Matuško, J., Borrelli, F. (2014). Stochastic model predictive control for building HVAC systems: Complexity and conservatism. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 23 (1), 101-116.
Mesbah, A. (2016). Stochastic model predictive control: An overview and perspectives for future research. IEEE Control Systems Magazine 36 (6), 30-44.
Oldewurtel, F., Jones, C. N., Parisio, A., Morari, M. (2014). Stochastic model predictive control for building climate control. IEEE Trans. Contr. Syst. Technol., vol. 22, pp. 1198â1205.