(344n) Effects of Ni Site Density on Deactivation Rates and Mechanisms during Ethene Oligomerization on Ni-Beta Zeolites
AIChE Annual Meeting
2020
2020 Virtual AIChE Annual Meeting
Catalysis and Reaction Engineering Division
Poster Session: Advances in Zeolite Science and Technology
Friday, November 20, 2020 - 8:00am to 9:00am
Alkene oligomerization catalyzed by Ni2+ cations on zeolites proceeds via the coordination-insertion mechanism,1 but rates decrease with time-on-stream due to deactivation1,2 according to different mechanistic proposals2,3. Deactivation phenomena are complicated by the presence of activation periods at initial times, and the behavior of residual Brønsted acid sites present. We synthesized Ni-Li-Beta materials with varying Ni density (Si/Al = 12, Ni/Al = 0.06-0.25), wherein Li+ replaces H+ sites. Ethene oligomerization rates (453 K, 0.01-1 kPa C2H4) were measured in a differential reactor, and combined with in situ X-ray absorption (XAS) to investigate Ni structure during deactivation. In situ XAS revealed that Ni is present as isolated Ni2+ (without observing Ni+, NiO, or Ni0) during deactivation, reflecting poisoning of Ni sites by heavier molecular weight intermediates. The molar selectivity toward oligomer products at fixed ethene conversion did not change as Ni-Li-Beta deactivated to different extents, indicating non-selective deactivation of each Ni site. Deactivation transients were modeled using an apparent nth order deactivation model, where the order in Ni site concentration (n), the apparent deactivation constant (kd), and the product formation rate are fitted parameters. Second-order deactivation rates are measured at high Ni density, suggesting two Ni sites are involved in the deactivation mechanism, as proposed via formation of Ni-alkyl-Ni intermediates2. In contrast, first-order deactivation rates are measured at low Ni density, implicating a single-site deactivation mechanism. This quantitative approach allows modeling the loss in number of active Ni sites during deactivation of catalysts of different composition and at different reaction conditions.
References:
(1) Joshi, R.; Gounder, R. ACS Catal. 2018, 8,
(2) Mlinar, A. N.; Baur, G. B.; Getsoian, A. B.; Bell, A. T. Catal. 2012, 296, 156.
(3) Mlinar, A. N.; Shylesh, S.; Ho, O. C.; Bell, A. T. ACS Catal. 2014, 4,