(353c) Developing a Closed-Loop Optimum Pumping Sequence with Shear Thinning Fluid for Enhanced Hydraulic Fracturing
AIChE Annual Meeting
2020
2020 Virtual AIChE Annual Meeting
Topical Conference: Next-Gen Manufacturing
Advanced Modelling and Data Systems Applications in Next-Gen Manufacturing I
Tuesday, November 17, 2020 - 8:30am to 8:45am
In recent years, hydraulic fracturing with high-viscosity gels has been one of the most explored topics both in theory and practice. The use of high viscosity gels has resulted in fractures with higher fracture conductivity and longer propped length[3-5]. The most commonly used gels in hydraulic fracturing are shear thinning fluids which sufficiently reduce pressure drop at the wellbore and fractures. One of the major problems associated with using these gels is that they leak off into the reservoir and eventually cause formation damage by chocking pore throats. These gels also lead to sufficient damage inside the fractures by mechanisms like proppant crushing and cake deposition. The formation and fracture damage phenomenon are sometimes very severe and can have a significant negative impact on the oil and gas production[6-8]. However, there is a dearth of study that considers all these factors and proposes an optimal operation sequence for practice. Consequently, the current challenge for the operators is the choice of a gel viscosity that would lead to minimum formation and fracture damage along with determining the proper pumping schedule to achieve optimal fracture geometry.
The work presented here attempts to address this challenge by proposing a novel methodology that can be used for deriving the optimal operating parameters for hydraulic fracturing with gels. Specifically, a novel model describing fracture propagation and multiphase reservoir behavior is developed. This model precisely predicts the formation damage phenomenon due to the leak-off of high-viscosity gel and also predicts the fracture damage due to filter cake deposition. Once the formation and fracture damage are modeled, they are used as the initial conditions for predicting the oil and gas production from a reservoir by utilizing a three-dimensional in-house reservoir simulator. The sensitivity analysis of hydrocarbon production is performed by adjusting three parameters, which are the gel viscosity, average fracture conductivity and propped surface area. The sensitivity analysis gives us a value of gel viscosity at which the maximum oil and gas production is achieved. The optimal value of gel viscosity is then used in developing a pumping schedule to attain the optimal values of average fracture conductivity and propped surface area. Since pumping operation in practice is a multi-input and multi-output system, a closed-loop model predictive controller (MPC) is designed to get an optimum pumping schedule. Specifically, the flow rate of gel and concentration of proppant are the two manipulated inputs, and average fracture conductivity and propped surface area are the two outputs. Additionally, several practical considerations are incorporated through constraints like the maximum amounts of fluid and proppant to be injected. This closed-loop MPC scheme is developed by utilizing a computationally less intensive reduced-order model for the process followed by the development of a Kalman filter to estimate the unmeasurable states using feedback measurements from the process. The MPC problem is formulated including the constraints and the reduced order model, and since, the operation time is fixed it becomes a shrinking horizon closed-loop optimization problem which is solved to obtain the optimal input for each time interval. This closed-loop structure of the proposed methodology extends its application to real-time operations where a plant-model mismatch is plausible. In summary, this work shows that for a given reservoir, we can calculate the viscosity of fracture gel using which an optimum pumping schedule can be obtained for the maximum oil and gas production from that reservoir.
Literature Cited:
[1] Wang, Q., et al., Natural gas from shale formationâthe evolution, evidences and challenges of shale gas revolution in United States. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014. 30: p. 1-28.
[2] Jr., Alfred Jennings. âFracturing Fluids - Then and Now.â Journal of Petroleum Technology, vol. 48, no. 7, 1996.
[3] Clark, J.b. âA Hydraulic Process for Increasing the Productivity of Wells.â Journal of Petroleum Technology, vol. 1, no. 01, Jan. 1949.
[4] Seright, R.s. âUse of Preformed Gels for Conformance Control in Fractured Systems.â SPE Production & Facilities, vol. 12, no. 01, Jan. 1997.
[5] Al-Muntasheri, Ghaithan A. âA Critical Review of Hydraulic Fracturing Fluids over the Last Decade.â SPE Western North American and Rocky Mountain Joint Meeting, 2014.
[6] Wang, Yilin, et al. âSimulation of Gel Damage on Fracture-Fluid Cleanup and Long-Term Recovery in Tight-Gas Reservoirs.â SPE Eastern Regional/AAPG Eastern Section Joint Meeting, 2008.
[7] Maloney, Daniel R., et al. âNon-Darcy Gas Flow Through Propped Fractures: Effects of Partial Saturation, Gel Damage, and Stress.â SPE Production Engineering, vol. 4, no. 04, 1989, pp. 417â422.
[8] Yi, X. âModel for Displacement of Herschel-Buckley Non-Newtonian Fluid by Newtonian Fluid in Porous Media and Its Application in Fracturing Fluid Cleanup.â SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, 2004.