(512u) 29si Solid State MAS NMR Study on Leaching Behaviors of Mg-Bearing Silicate Structures for CO­2 Mineralization | AIChE

(512u) 29si Solid State MAS NMR Study on Leaching Behaviors of Mg-Bearing Silicate Structures for CO­2 Mineralization

Understanding fate and chemistries of different silicate structures in minerals are important research aims for carbon mineralization, where captured CO2 is converted to a thermodynamically stable solid carbonate phase. In this study, 29Si MAS NMR and XRPD analysis were applied to investigate the fate of different silicate structures (Q0 – Q4) in heat-treated Mg-bearing mineral (serpentine) when they were exposed to a CO2-water system (carbonic acid). It was able to explain complicate silicate structures of heat-treated serpentine minerals and its dissolution mechanisms with the identified silicate structures. While natural serpentine mineral (untreated) has a single crystalline Q3 silicate structure, the heat-treated serpentine was identified as a mixture of amorphous (Q1: dehydroxylate I, Q2: enstatite, Q4: silica) and crystalline (Q0: forsterite, Q3: dehydroxylate II and serpentine) silicate structures. The heat-treated serpentine leaching experiments showed that both Mg and Si in the amorphous silicate structures (Q1: dehydroxylate I, Q2: enstatite) are more soluble than those in crystalline phase (Q0: forsterite, Q3: dehydroxylate II and serpentine), indicating that the amorphous phases play important roles in the high reactivity of the heat-treated serpentine minerals. Then, the solubilities of different silicate structures in the heat-treated serpentine were qualitatively evaluated and they were in the order of Q1 (dehydroxylate I) > Q2 (enstatite) >> Q0 (forsterite) > Q3 (dehydroxylate II) > Q3 (serpentine). Thus, tuning the natural serpentine silicate structure (Q3) towards Q1 and Q2 phases should be maximized during the heat treatment process and it would significantly improve carbon sequestration potential of serpentine minerals.