(613b) Computational Modeling of the Gut-Bone Axis and Implications of Butyrate Treatment on Osteoimmunology
AIChE Annual Meeting
2020
2020 Virtual AIChE Annual Meeting
Food, Pharmaceutical & Bioengineering Division
Systems Biology of Metabolism
Thursday, November 19, 2020 - 8:15am to 8:30am
We are developing a multi-compartment physiologically based pharmacokinetic model to track and quantify effects of butyrate on Tregs in the gut, blood, and bone marrow. The model consists of five species butyrate, naïve CD4+ T cells, Tregs, TGF-β, and Wnt10b distributed across three compartments intestine, blood, and bone. We consider an open system with the processes of formation, excretion, differentiation, cell death, and migration to another compartment. We define mass balances on butyrate, TGF-β, and Wnt10b and population balances for the naïve CD4+ T cells, Tregs. The microbial fermentation of the dietary fiber modulates the constant production of butyrate in the intestine. The constant supply of butyrate in the intestine depends on the degradation and migration to the blood and bone marrow. The butyrate that absorbs into the blood and bone compartments differentiates the naive CD4+ T cells in the bloodstream and bone marrow. The differentiation rate constant is evaluated based on the dynamic in vitro differentiation of naive CD4+ T cells to Tregs in the presence of butyrate. The system is assumed to be at steady state to estimate the unknown parameters for the model based on the in vivo experimental butyrate concentration and percentage Tregs of total cells in each compartment. Tregs accumulate in the bone and induce upregulation of TGF-β, which suppresses an inflammatory state. Tregs also promote Wnt10b secretion that increases net bone formation. The variation of butyrate concentration from homeostasis value changes the percentage of Tregs, and the production of TGF-β, and Wnt10b. We estimate the kinetic parameters for the differentiation of Tregs, fold changes of TGF-β, and Wnt10b with change of butyrate concentration based on data from published in vivo experimental studies.
Using the model, we analyze experimental data reported in [2] to evaluate the expansion of Tregs, TGF-β, and Wnt10b in the bone marrow. The probiotic LGG increases butyrate concentration in intestine and serum blood by 0.18 μM and 0.29 μM respectively. We assume butyrate concentration in bone marrow is same as serum blood. Our simulation result shows 6% increase of Tregs, 3.4-fold increase of TGF-β, and 3-fold increase of Wnt10b in the bone marrow consistent with the net change in formation due to stimulus of a probiotic microcrobiota in the gut. We also analyze the pathological condition where butyrate concentration reduces due to dysbiosis. Li et al. [3] reduced the serum butyrate concentration 0.18 μM using antibiotic in mouse model and reported 5% reduction of Tregs in bone marrow from homeostasis condition. We set the change of intestine butyrate concentration to -0.11 μM in our model to get 0.18 μM reduction of butyrate concentration in serum blood and observe 5.5% reduction of Tregs in bone marrow consistent with the experimental result. The computational approach described here gives insight into the pharmacokinetics of butyrate, biodistribution of Tregs in the gut-bone axis, fold changes of Wnt10b in bone marrow, and their contributions to modulating bone formation. This deeper understanding will allow us to explore the potential of modifying butyrate through dietary interventions as a treatment for different pathological conditions related to bone loss such as estrogen deficiency, hyperthyroidism, and vitamin D deficiency.
References
- Furusawa, Y. et al. Nature.7480:446-450, 2013.
- Tyagi, A. M. et al. Immunity.6:1116-1131, 2018.
- Li, J. Y. et al. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 130(4):1767-1781,
Acknowledgements
Research reported in this abstract was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award number R35GM133763. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.