(16a) Dynamic Discrepancy Reduced-Order Modeling and Advanced Control of a Fischer-Tropsch Slurry Bubble Column Reactor
AIChE Annual Meeting
2021
2021 Annual Meeting
Computing and Systems Technology Division
Estimation and Control under uncertainty
Sunday, November 7, 2021 - 3:30pm to 3:49pm
To address the challenge of reduced-order models in advanced control under uncertainty, a novel grey-box model identification algorithm for process control is developed by integrating dynamic operability mapping [1] and Bayesian calibration. In the developed framework, the plant is represented by a high-fidelity model, and the reduced-order model dynamic discrepancy function is added to reduce the output dimensions of the dynamic calibration problem [2]. The dynamic discrepancy terms are in the form of Gaussian processes with Bayesian smoothing spline, so the uncertainty propagation can be decomposed into independent discrepancy terms [3]. The reduced-order model is calibrated using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm, and a Bayesian model selection criterion is implemented to avoid model underfit/overfit.
For the application in focus, a setpoint tracking and disturbance rejection MPC is implemented for a Fischer-Tropsch synthesis process that takes place in a slurry bubble column reactor. The Fischer-Tropsch process is a collection of reactions that process syngas to produce higher-valued hydrocarbons in the liquid products. Because the products of this process include a wide range of hydrocarbons from C1 to C50+ and the product distribution is influenced by the reactor pressure and temperature, controlling such process conditions simultaneously and accurately is crucial to yield the product with desired specifications. The high-fidelity dynamic model is developed based on a hydrodynamic model from the literature [4] and extended to paraffin and olefins products in the slurry phase. The proposed reduced-order model predictive controller is compared to traditional and nonlinear MPC formulations to evaluate its performance, considering different scenarios of setpoint tracking and disturbance rejection.
References:
[1] V. Gazzaneo, J. C. Carrasco, D. R. Vinson, and F. V. Lima, âProcess Operability Algorithms: Past, Present, and Future Developments,â Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 2457â2470, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b05181.
[2] K. S. Bhat, D. S. Mebane, P. Mahapatra, and C. B. Storlie, âUpscaling Uncertainty with Dynamic Discrepancy for a Multi-Scale Carbon Capture System,â Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 112, no. 520, pp. 1453â1467, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1080/01621459.2017.1295863.
[3] B. J. Reich, C. B. Storlie, and H. D. Bondell, âVariable Selection in Bayesian Smoothing Spline ANOVA Models: Application to Deterministic Computer Codes,â Technometrics, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 110â120, May 2009, doi: 10.1198/TECH.2009.0013.
[4] C. Maretto and R. Krishna, âModelling of a Bubble Column Slurry Reactor for FischerâTropsch Synthesis,â Catalysis Today, vol. 52, no. 2â3, pp. 279â289, Sep. 1999, doi: 10.1016/S0920-5861(99)00082-6.