(303a) Data-Driven Development of Approximate Inertial Forms and Closures for Coarse-Scale Modeling of Multiphase Flows
AIChE Annual Meeting
2021
2021 Annual Meeting
Computing and Systems Technology Division
Data-Driven Techniques for Dynamic Modeling, Estimation and Control II
Tuesday, November 9, 2021 - 12:30pm to 12:49pm
We train a neural network to approximate the continuous-time dynamics of the system in terms of the amplitudes of the first two, "determining" POD modes. Since the higher POD modes are functions (on our data) of the first two "determining" ones, that parametrize our approximate inertial manifold, we reconstruct the full solution from these two time series through a network that has learned the manifold, i.e. the higher 8 POD coefficients as a function of the 2 "determining" ones, as depicted in Fig.1(b).
In the second portion of this work, we attempt to learn the right-hand-side operator of the averaged PDE through (a) a black box model and (b) a learned "grey-box" model that exploits the known parts/structure of the operator: everything else but the closure. To evolve the relevant fields, a pair of unknown closure terms must be modelled, Fl (x, t), Gl (x, t) = Cl (system state (x, t)) for the wall-normal liquid flux and summed dissipative terms, respectively. These terms are learned from coarse evolution data [7]: we train a network to approximate these closure terms Cl away from the wall, using only x-local information. Close to the wall, we learn a smooth non-decreasing function that corrects the effect of the drag. The wall function is zero in a region close to the wall, and asymptotes to one far from it. Before applying this closure-learning method to the data derived from the full 2D multiphase flow, we validate the approach on a simplified version of the problem with an explicitly known closure function (which we show we can accurately recover).
[1] C. Meneveau and J. Katz. Scale-invariance and turbulence models for large-eddy simulation. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 32(1):1â32, 2000.
[2] F. J. Alexander, G. Johnson, G. L. Eyink, and I. G. Kevrekidis. Equation-free implementation of statistical moment closures. Physical Review E, 77:026701, 2008.
[3] S. Ansumali, C. E. Frouzakis, I. V. Karlin, and I. G. Kevrekidis. Exploring Hydrodynamic Closures for the Lid-driven Micro-cavity. arXiv:0502018 [cond-mat], 2005.
[4] C. Foias, M. S. Jolly, I. G. Kevrekidis, G. R. Sell, and E. S. Titi. On the computation of inertial manifolds. Physics Letters A, 131(7):433â436, 1988.
[5] R. Rico-Martinez, K. Krischer, I. G. Kevrekidis, M. C. Kube, and J. L. Hudson. Discrete vs. continuous-time nonlinear signal processing of cu electrodissolution data. Chemical Engineering Communications, 118(1):25â48, 1992.
[6] M. Ma, J. Lu, and G. Tryggvason. Using statistical learning to close two-fluid multiphase flow equations for bubbly flows in vertical channels. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 85:336â347, 2016.
[7] S. Lee, M. Kooshkbaghi, K. Spiliotis, C. I. Siettos, and I. G. Kevrekidis. Coarse-scale PDEs from fine-scale observations via machine learning. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 30(1):013141, 2020.