(501h) Development of Two Sequential Kmc Models to Describe Ligand Exchange and Charge Transport for CsPbBr3 Quantum Dots with Improved Stability and Charge Carrier Mobility
AIChE Annual Meeting
2021
2021 Annual Meeting
Computational Molecular Science and Engineering Forum
Practical Applications of Computational Chemistry and Molecular Simulation II
Wednesday, November 10, 2021 - 2:30pm to 2:45pm
First, we proposed a kinetic Monte Carlo (kMC) model to enhance our understanding of the ligand-exchange phenomenon. The developed kMC model describes the surface of QDs in the solution using a two-dimensional lattice of size N [5]. Four microscopic events were considered in the kMC simulation to describe the ligand-exchange process: (i) attachment of long-chain ligand, (ii) detachment of long-chain ligand, (iii) attachment of short-chain ligand, and (iv) detachment of short-chain ligand. Parameters such as the ligand concentration, the size of QDs, and the solution concentration were available from the relevant experimental data [6,7]. The activation energy of the attachment and detachment rate was derived from the difference in bandgap energy values before and after ligand exchange. The kMC model enables the prediction of ligand exchange ratio and morphology on the surface of QDs.
However, the direct measurement of surface characteristics of QDs in the solution (i.e., surface morphology and exchanged ligand ratio) is not readily available in the literature [8]. Therefore, a model (i.e., a charge-transport kMC model) was developed to quantify the state of ligand exchange. Since the activation energy values for the transport of exciton and charge carrier are affected by the QDsâ surface characteristics [9], the simulation results of the charge-transport kMC model can reasonably explain the ligand-exchange phenomena. Similar to the ligand-exchange kMC model, four events were considered in the kMC simulation for charge transport: (i) charge carrier generation by light absorption, (ii) diffusion by hopping, (iii) decay, and (iv) recombination. Additionally, the charge-transport rates of the QD core and short-chain ligands were calculated from Marcus formula. The long-chain ligand rate was computed from the Miller-Abrahams formula that is widely used in the charge-transport kMC of organic solar cells. The developed model that integrates the ligand-exchange kMC model and the charge-transport kMC model was validated by the Current-Voltage curve data. [10]
In conclusion, our study addressed the knowledge gap present in the interpretation and modeling of the ligand-exchange phenomenon. Specifically, a first-principled ligand-exchange kMC model and a charge-transport model were integrated to simulate the ligand-exchange phenomenon. Subsequently, this model was validated against a system of (long-chain) oleic acid ligands with (short-chain) MPA ligands. The developed model provided a foundation for optimizing the QD surface passivation, by enhancing stability and charge mobility.
Literature Cited
[1] J. Zhang et al., âLow-Dimensional Halide Perovskites and Their Advanced Optoelectronic Applications,â Nano-Micro Lett., vol. 9, no. 3, p. 36, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s40820-017-0137-5.
[2] A. Heuer-Jungemann et al., âThe role of ligands in the chemical synthesis and applications of inorganic nanoparticles,â Chem. Rev., vol. 119, no. 8, pp. 4819â4880, 2019, doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00733.
[3] M. J. Smith, C. H. Lin, S. Yu, and V. V Tsukruk, âComposite Structures with Emissive Quantum Dots for Light Enhancement,â Adv. Opt. Mater., vol. 1801072, no. 4, pp. 1â35, 2019, doi: 10.1002/adom.201801072.
[4] G. H. Carey, A. L. Abdelhady, Z. Ning, S. M. Thon, O. M. Bakr, and E. H. Sargent, âColloidal Quantum Dot Solar Cells,â Chem. Rev., 2015, doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00063.
[5] N. Sitapure, R. Epps, M. Abolhasani, and J. S.-I. Kwon, âMultiscale modeling and optimal operation of millifluidic synthesis of perovskite quantum dots: Towards size-controlled continuous manufacturing,â Chem. Eng. J., vol. 413, p. 127905, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.127905.
[6] R. W. Epps, K. C. Felton, C. W. Coley, and M. Abolhasani, âAutomated microfluidic platform for systematic studies of colloidal perovskite nanocrystals: towards continuous nano-manufacturing,â Lab Chip, vol. 17, no. 23, pp. 4040â4047, 2017.
[7] S. R, H. V Vishaka, K. J, and R. G. Balakrishna, âGreen to Blue Light Emitting CsPbBr3 Perovskite by Ligand Exchange and its Encapsulation by TiO2 for Tandem Effect in Photovoltaic Applications,â ACS Appl. Nano Mater., vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 6089â6098, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1021/acsanm.0c01293.
[8] R. Maugi, P. Hauer, J. Bowen, E. Ashman, E. Hunsicker, and M. Platt, âA methodology for characterising nanoparticle size and shape using nanopores,â Nanoscale, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 262â270, 2020.
[9] C. R. Kagan, E. Lifshitz, E. H. Sargent, and D. V Talapin, âBuilding devices from colloidal quantum dots,â Science (80-. )., vol. 353, no. 6302, 2016.
[10] J. Li et al., â50âFold EQE improvement up to 6.27% of solutionâprocessed allâinorganic perovskite CsPbBr3 QLEDs via surface ligand density control,â Adv. Mater., vol. 29, no. 5, p. 1603885, 2017.