(639e) Mechanistic Insights into Acid Catalysis: The Myths and Challenges of Small Voids
AIChE Annual Meeting
2021
2021 Annual Meeting
Catalysis and Reaction Engineering Division
In Honor of the 2018 William H. Walker Award Winner III (Invited Talks)
Thursday, November 11, 2021 - 4:50pm to 5:40pm
Selectivity and reactivity differences among Al-based zeotypes are often attributed to their different acid strength. The acid strength of aluminosilicates is, in fact, essentially the same for all frameworks. Instead, these differences in their function as catalysts reflect confinement and sieving effects that favor specific transition states and/or the preferential diffusion of certain molecules that the observer then detects in the extracrystalline fluid phase. The effects of acid strength (a precise and useful term that remains frustratingly inaccessible to experimental assessments for solids) on reactivity merely reflect differences in charge among the relevant transition states, inextricably linked to the consequents of confinement brought forth by van der Waals contacts that reflect differences in size and shape among transition states. The preferential location of methyl branches near the end of hydrocarbon chains among alkane isomerization products formed on 1D zeolites has been quaintly ascribed to âpore mouth catalysisâ, but merely reflects a preference for effusing them over other isomers. One last example addresses whether zeotypes can activate H2; in fact, protons catalyze hydrogenation turnovers at rates predicted by those of the well-known reverse reaction (monomolecular dehydrogenation), and reaction-derived organic residues also catalyze hydrogenation-dehydrogenation events but with kinetic fingerprints that are clearly discernable from those of proton-catalyzed routes.