(261a) Biomaterials That Breathe for Regenerative Engineering
AIChE Annual Meeting
2022
2022 Annual Meeting
Materials Engineering and Sciences Division
Biomaterial Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering I
Tuesday, November 15, 2022 - 8:00am to 8:18am
Materials and Methods: We reinforced the oxygen generating scaffolds with microparticles that contained the cargo for oxygen release. These microparticles were synthesized by encapsulating CaO2 within a hydrophobic PCL phase through an emulsification process. We then fabricated the oxygen generating scaffolds using a 5% (w/v) gelatin-based hydrogel matrix and 13.5 (w/v) CaO2-loaded PCL microparticles. Subsequently, we carried out swelling, degradation, high-resolution SEM, and dynamic mechanical analyses for the oxygen generating scaffolds. The PCL content was modified in the microparticles to evaluate how the hydrophobic barrier alters the oxygen release kinetics of the scaffold. The PCL concentrations analyzed ranged from 5-20% (w/v) PCL. The in vitro cytocompatibility of the oxygen generating scaffolds was studied using different cell types including fibroblasts, myoblasts, primary cardiac fibroblasts, stem cells, or osteoblasts in long term cultures up to 35 days. Cellular response to oxygen generating scaffolds was characterized through metabolic activity, lactate dehydrogenase activity, and apoptosis assays, and pH measurements. Finally, the oxygen generating scaffolds were used to regenerate critical size calvaria defects in a rat model.
Results and Discussion: We have shown controlled and sustained release of oxygen over 4 weeks in vitro. We successfully tuned the oxygen release kinetics by varying the PCL and CaO2 concentrations. We were able to increase the amount of dissolved oxygen with increasing CaO2 loading. We also have tuned the material properties such as swelling capacities, degradation, and mechanical properties of the scaffolds. To characterize the in vitro cellular response to our biodegradable oxygen generating scaffolds, we performed 3D-encapsulation experiments using fibroblasts, myoblasts, and primary cardiac fibroblasts, stem cells, or osteoblasts in these scaffolds. The in vitro results showed enhanced cell survival, proliferation, and function under hypoxic environments. During continuous oxygen release, the 3D constructs maintained a stable tissue culture environment between pH 8 to 9. The in vivo rat model demonstrated that these scaffolds regenerate a bone volume that was comparable to the native bone and yielded higher than 90% regeneration in critical size cranial defects. In addition, in vivo bone remodeling and vascularization was confirmed via immunohistochemistry for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) staining.
Conclusions: We have developed a modular microparticle synthesis process using an emulsification technique that produced a wide range of oxygen generating scaffolds with distinct oxygen release kinetics. These scaffolds released oxygen consistently over 4 weeks with dissolved oxygen levels up to 35 days under hypoxia. Material properties such as compressive moduli, swelling, and degradation were tuned and controlled by varying the concentration of CaO2 in the oxygen generating scaffolds. Our scaffolds were also tailorable to diverse cell types. The in vitro results support that the oxygen generating component provides functional benefits for long-term cell cultures. The metabolic activity and apoptotic activity were controlled by the oxygen generating scaffolds. In addition, we achieved stable cellular microenvironments without causing major fluctuations in pH. We anticipate that these scaffolds will be easily modified and customized to obtain a wide range of oxygen release kinetics and biological properties for different regenerative engineering applications. Our technology, along with efforts to improve vascularization strategies, has the potential to advance the in vivo clinical performance of 3D tissue scaffolds.
References: 1Nguyen, M.A., Camci-Unal, G., Trends in Biotechnology, 38(2): 178-190, 2020. 2Suvarnapathaki, S., Wu, X., Lantigua, D., Nguyen, M.A., Camci-Unal, G., Nature Asia Materials, 11(1): 1-18, 2019. 3Suvarnapathaki, S., Nguyen, M.A., Goulopoulos, A., Lantigua, D., Camci-Unal, G., Biomaterials Science, 9, 2519-2532, 2021. 4Suvarnapathaki, S., Wu, X., Zhang, T., Nguyen, M.A., Goulopoulos, A.A., Wu, B., Camci-Unal, G., Bioactive Materials, 13, 64-81, 2022.