(301f) Grid-Responsive Smart Automation Methods to Incorporate Renewable Energy Sources – a Case Study
AIChE Annual Meeting
2022
2022 Annual Meeting
Computing and Systems Technology Division
Industrial Applications in Design and Operations
Tuesday, November 15, 2022 - 2:00pm to 2:18pm
This work presents a case study of a mineral processing industrial site in the United States and compares different methods of grid-responsive smart automation integrated with renewables. Using historical utility bills, facility process data and various process models, the study seeks to quantify the savings and costs of various schemes in an overall effort to improve the economics of facility operation. The models compare solar arrays, battery storage systems, smart pumping schemes, and various combinations of those with process-integrated technology as viable ways to reduce energy costs. Table 1 summarizes the costs and savings of all scenarios.
The study finds that a solar array by itself is prohibitively expensive for this facility. This is due to relatively high peak demand charges and the fact that the solar arrayâs output does not align well with the facilityâs real-time power usage. When a solar array is coupled with grid-responsive automation, however, a synergy is created. The addition of a battery for load shifting helps the economics significantly, bringing the paypack period down from 28.4 to 17.0 years. A key finding of this study, however, is that rather than battery storage, the facility can utilize existing process flexibility, namely pumps with variable frequency drives and built-in water storage capacity, to shift loads. The combination of solar with this novel smart pumping scheme brings the payback period for this investment down to 10.2 years. The smart pumping scheme by itself has a near instant payback (0.13 years), demonstrating that enhanced automation can be used to leverage existing process equipment to operate as a âbatteryâ, but at only a fraction of the cost of an actual battery. Grid-responsive smart automation is shown to assist in cutting the payback period of solar energy installations and demonstrates its potential to incorporate renewable energy and reduce costs.
References
[1] Y. Choi and J. Song, âReview of photovoltaic and wind power systems utilized in the mining industry,â Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 75. Elsevier Ltd, pp. 1386â1391, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.127.
[2] R. G. Votteler and A. C. Brent, âA literature review on the potential of renewable electricity sources for mining operations in South Africa,â Journal of Energy in Southern Africa, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 1â21, 2016, doi: 10.17159/2413-3051/2016/v27i2a1337.
[3] B. Westberg, D. Machalek, S. Denton, D. Sellers, and K. Powell, âProactive automation of a batch manufacturer in a smart grid environment,â Smart and Sustainable Manufacturing Systems, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 110â131, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1520/SSMS20180020.
[4] M. Henning, D. Machalek, and K. M. Powell, âIntegrating a Microturbine into a Discrete Manufacturing Process with Combined Heat and Power Using Smart Scheduling and Automation,â Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, vol. 47, pp. 293â298, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-818597-1.50046-1.
[5] D. Machalek and K. Powell, âAutomated electrical demand peak leveling in a manufacturing facility with short term energy storage for smart grid participation,â Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 52, pp. 100â109, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2019.06.001.
[6] M. Sheha, K. Mohammadi, and K. Powell, âSolving the duck curve in a smart grid environment using a non-cooperative game theory and dynamic pricing profiles,â Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 220, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113102.