(418c) First-Principles Modeling of Discharge Product Surface Thermodynamics in Na-O2 Batteries
AIChE Annual Meeting
2022
2022 Annual Meeting
Topical Conference: Material Interfaces as Energy Solutions
Interfacial Systems for Energy Application: Modeling and Simulation
Tuesday, November 15, 2022 - 4:06pm to 4:24pm
The goal of the present work is to couple computational and experimental studies to elucidate key molecular-level mechanistic insights of the parasitic reactivity occurring at the surface of the NaO2 discharge product. We utilize Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations to study the surface thermodynamics of the NaO2 discharge product, of which the knowledge significantly trails that of the closely related Li-O2 battery chemistry. We elucidate thermodynamically relevant surface facets and surface layer stoichiometries by constructing an ab-initio surface phase diagram of the NaO2 discharge product. We discover an inverse relationship between coordination and stability of surface terminations under vacuum. We further observe a competing energetic effect between smoothness and packing density at the surface layer. In addition, we identify a representative set of surface features (including terraces, steps, and defects) for use in subsequent studies of parasitic reactivity mechanisms at the NaO2 discharge product surface.
As an extension of the surface phase diagram, an ab-initio mechanistic surface dissolution analysis is applied to the identified surface terminations, probing the effect of coordination on the thermodynamics governing surface dissolution. In this analysis, the thermodynamic energy barriers are compared between surface terminations, and as with the surface stability, we discover that there is an inverse relationship between coordination and the thermodynamic barrier for surface dissolution. In considering both stoichiometric and off-stoichiometric pathways, we find dissolution will follow a concerted pathway, such that stoichiometric NaO2 units will dissolute from the surface, rather than as individual Na+ and O2- ions. In closing, we comment how the current work lays the groundwork for future combined computational-experimental studies and how they may be used to propose practical design changes.
References:
(1) Samira, S.; Deshpande, S.; Greeley, J.; Nikolla, E. Aprotic Alkali MetalâO 2 Batteries: Role of Cathode Surface-Mediated Processes and Heterogeneous Electrocatalysis. ACS Energy Letters 2021, 6 (2). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.0c02506.
(2) Kwak, W.-J.; Rosy; Sharon, D.; Xia, C.; Kim, H.; Johnson, L. R.; Bruce, P. G.; Nazar, L. F.; Sun, Y.-K.; Frimer, A. A.; Noked, M.; Freunberger, S. A.; Aurbach, D. LithiumâOxygen Batteries and Related Systems: Potential, Status, and Future. Chemical Reviews 2020, 120 (14). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00609.
(3) Sun, Q.; Liu, J.; Xiao, B.; Wang, B.; Banis, M.; Yadegari, H.; Adair, K. R.; Li, R.; Sun, X. Visualizing the Oxidation Mechanism and Morphological Evolution of the CubicâShaped Superoxide Discharge Product in NaâAir Batteries. Advanced Functional Materials 2019, 29 (13). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201808332.
(4) Kim, J.; Park, H.; Lee, B.; Seong, W. M.; Lim, H.-D.; Bae, Y.; Kim, H.; Kim, W. K.; Ryu, K. H.; Kang, K. Dissolution and Ionization of Sodium Superoxide in SodiumâOxygen Batteries. Nature Communications 2016, 7 (1). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10670.