(465d) Carbon Dioxide Capacity Retention on Elastic Layered Metal Organic Frameworks Subjected to Hydrothermal Cycling
AIChE Annual Meeting
2022
2022 Annual Meeting
Separations Division
Adsorbent Materials: MOFs
Wednesday, November 16, 2022 - 8:54am to 9:12am
A subset of SPCs are the so-called elastic layered metal-organic frameworks (ELMs). ELMs are composed of metal vertex ions, connecting ligands, and charge-balancing counter-ions that are arranged into two-dimensional sheets that in turn assemble into three-dimensional stacked structures. These materials show a latent porosity for the adsorption of gas molecules above a specific pressure, termed the âgate pressureâ, that results in an expansion of the interlayer spacing between the two-dimensional sheets and a corresponding jump in the adsorption isotherm that cannot be classified in accordance with the conventional IUPAC isotherm designations. The exotic adsorption characteristics of ELMs are not observed in more familiar commercial adsorbents such as activated carbons or zeolites. Nor are they found in the adsorption isotherms of MOFs with rigid pore structures. These unusual features confer upon ELMs potential advantages for CO2 capture, inasmuch as they combine a high selectivity for separation of CO2 from gas mixtures with a low energy requirement for adsorbent regeneration and CO2 recovery.
Adsorption of carbon dioxide on elastic layered metal-organic frameworks (ELMs) was investigated during and after exposure to water. Two ELM variants, ELM-11 and ELM-12, were contacted with water vapor and the impact of cyclical exposure on the CO2 capacity of the adsorbents was observed. ELM-11 was found to lose CO2 capacity with each successive exposure to water, whereas ELM-12 retained CO2 capacity through four exposure cycles. Density functional theory calculations were performed to interpret these observations. Changing the counter-ion from the simple tetrafluoroborate (BF4-) to the larger and more complex trifluoromethanesulfonate (CF3SO3-) anion expands the number of potential binding sites for adsorbate molecules. While CO2 directly competes with other adsorbates for binding sites in ELM-11, CO2 does not directly compete with other adsorbates in ELM-12 due to its preference for direct interaction with both fluorine and oxygen atoms in CF3SO3-.