(623f) Autoencoder Based Dimensionality Reduction to Select Representative Periods for Energy System Planning Models
AIChE Annual Meeting
2022
2022 Annual Meeting
Computing and Systems Technology Division
Modeling, Control, and Optimization of Energy Systems II
Thursday, November 17, 2022 - 2:05pm to 2:24pm
Here, we propose a new class of RPS methods for energy system planning models that address the limitations of conventional methods by incorporating: a) dimensionality reduction using auto-encoders prior to clustering and b) using estimated outputs as additional features in the RPS. The autoencoder consists of a 3-layer neural network (encoder) to reduce the dimension of the original data prior to the clustering process and a 2-layer neural network (decoder) to retrieve the representative periods identified from the clustering process in the original dimension. The autoencoder improves the performance of the clustering algorithm, but also facilitates using additional features such as estimated outputs produced from CEM evaluation over disjoint periods in the input data set in parallel (e.g. 1 week or 1 day). We propose three alternative RPS methods using dimensionality reduction, with two methods considering input and estimated output features in the clustering process using one and three auto-encoders, respectively. These three methods are compared against conventional RPS methods without dimensionality reduction in terms of the ability of the corresponding reduced-space CEM models to reproduce outcomes of the full-space CEM models. Extensive numerical experimentation across 1-bus, 3-bus and 8-bus electric power networks defined using data from the Texas region demonstrate that the proposed RPS method do not add a significant computational burden and can better reproduce full-space CEM outcomes - capacity, generation, cost and non-served energy - compared to conventional RPS methods. Moreover, one of the RPS methods leads to smaller magnitude of error in reproducing full-space CEM outcomes while using half the number of representative periods as conventional RPS methods (4 vs. 8 weeks), which points to the potential for speeding up CEM evaluation enabled by the method.