(289b) Monitoring Carbon Storage Sites Using Electromagnetics: Recovering a Baseline Conductivity Model at the Kemper Carbonsafe Site
AIChE Annual Meeting
2024
2024 AIChE Annual Meeting
Sustainable Engineering Forum
Engineering Geologic Carbon Dioxide Storage Systems I
Tuesday, October 29, 2024 - 8:18am to 8:36am
To validate previous simulation results and determine the suitability of EM for monitoring efforts, we conducted a test EM baseline survey at the Kemper County CarbonSAFE site in Mississippi. A map of the survey area is shown in Figure 1. Supercritical CO2 injection is planned at the marked 19-2 well location. Two transmitter dipoles were implemented, one oriented North-South along the highway, and the other forming a U-shape along county roads and forming an East-West dipole between the injection electrodes. The transmitters operate at a base frequency of 2.50 Hz. A high-temperature SQUID 3-component magnetometer receiver was flown along North-South flight lines spaced 75 m apart and 20 m altitude. The SQUID magnetometers were used due to their ability to detect magnetic fields lower than 0.1 pT with a low level of internal noise.
We performed a 3D inversion on the measured magnetics data to recover a baseline conductivity model. Nearby well logs were used to create a 1D reference model that is resistive in the top 900 m and conductive below. The geologic stratigraphic column of the region from previous studies suggests a sandstone aquifer at approximately 300 m depth (not present on the well logs due to logging starting depth) and 330 m of saline aquifer starting at 900 m. Figure 2 shows a cross-section depicting the recovered conductivity using the North-South transmitter. The inversion recovers a conductivity model with the conductive near surface reservoir despite not being present in the reference model. The saline aquifer is shown to start at about 1 km, be laterally continuous, and is approximately 300 m thick. Both results are consistent with known geology.
EM surveying methods successfully delineates the injection zone. Future surveys will use this recovered baseline model as a point of comparison so that the shape of the CO2 plume and reservoir health can be monitoring as the plume moves in the subsurface. Now that a baseline conductivity model for the area has been recovered and validated against known geology, simulations of different injection scenarios can be performed and analyzed to determine the usefulness of EM surveying methods for monitoring predicted CO2 plumes within the context of the full reservoir monitoring plan. While these results are promising for monitoring efforts at the Kemper CarbonSAFE site, the usefulness of EM elsewhere is dependent on local geology and the presence of anthropogenic sources of EM noise. For instance, EM will struggle with recovering the CO2 plume in deep storage reservoirs (depths greater than 2 km), conductive geologic overburden, or sites near urban areas. Therefore, modeling studies and test surveys are important to determine the feasibility of the monitoring strategy.