(371ad) Multi-Scale Dynamic Techno-Economic Analysis of Pulsed Electrochemical CO2 Reduction Process | AIChE

(371ad) Multi-Scale Dynamic Techno-Economic Analysis of Pulsed Electrochemical CO2 Reduction Process

Authors 

Na, J., Carnegie Mellon University
Lee, C. W., Kookmin University
Jin, K., Korea University
In recent years, research on pulsed electrochemical CO2 reduction (p-eCO2R) has gained attention, demonstrating merits such as high C2+ product selectivity, catalyst lifetime, and simple operation.1,2 It offers a method to enhance performance by applying voltage in pulse form without modifying the intrinsic characteristics of the electrolyzer. The authors argued that this method could have economic feasibility because the additional electricity energy from the anodic step is minimal.3,4 However, p-eCO2R suffers from the issue that product is not produced during the application of anodic potential. This results in an increase in the minimum selling price (MSP) of the product as the duration of the anodic potential increases, thereby undermining its economic feasibility. Furthermore, the injection of CO2 during the anodic step also contributes to an increase in unreacted CO2, potentially leading to a decrease in the purity of the products. Hence, there is a cost-trade-off between issues arising from pulse application and performance enhancement. Additionally, a pulse generator is required for applying pulse power supplement system, and discontinuous flow of products should be controlled before they enter the separation process.

Previous research has predominantly focused on improving stability and selectivity at the electrolyzer scale.5-7 However, optimizing the pulse profile is crucial, considering the cost trade-off associated with pulsed electrolysis and additional expenses incurred by supplementary processes. Therefore, techno-economic analysis (TEA) at the process scale of p-CO2R is essential. Furthermore, observing the performance of the electrolyzer based on various pulse profiles necessitates a multiphysics model.6,8

This study proposed a multiscale model that simultaneously considers pulsed CO2 electrochemical reduction process system and multiphysics within the electrolyzer and implemented optimization of the pulse profile from the perspectives of TEA and life cycle assessment (LCA). To accomplish this, a COMSOL-based multiphysics model and process simulations using Aspen Plus were created, and TEA/LCA was conducted by integrating these two distinct scale models using Matlab. The electrolyzer was configured using an anion exchange membrane (AEM)-based exchange membrane-electrode-assembly. To improve alignment with experimental data, the kinetics parameters of the electrolyzer were fitted using derivative-free optimization (DFO) methods. TEA indicator includes the MSP of products, incorporating additional costs for achieving high purity through separation processes and for the p-CO2R process. The system boundary of LCA is gate-to-gate, with global warming impact (GWI) set as the primary indicator. We integrated the completed multi-scale model with the DFO algorithm to find the optimal pulse profile. Finally, we connected this model with the real-time optimization (RTO) algorithm to implement real-time optimal operation based on a digital twin.

  1. Obasanjo, C.A., Gao, G., Khiarak, B.N., Pham, T.H., Crane, J., and Dinh, C.-T. (2023). Progress and perspectives of pulse electrolysis for stable electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction. Energy & Fuels 37, 13601-13623.
  2. Casebolt, R., Levine, K., Suntivich, J., and Hanrath, T. (2021). Pulse check: Potential opportunities in pulsed electrochemical CO2 reduction. Joule 5, 1987-2026.
  3. Lee, C.W., Cho, N.H., Nam, K.T., Hwang, Y.J., and Min, B.K. (2019). Cyclic two-step electrolysis for stable electrochemical conversion of carbon dioxide to formate. Nature communications 10, 3919.
  4. Engelbrecht, A., Uhlig, C., Stark, O., Hämmerle, M., Schmid, G., Magori, E., Wiesner-Fleischer, K., Fleischer, M., and Moos, R. (2018). On the electrochemical CO2 reduction at copper sheet electrodes with enhanced long-term stability by pulsed electrolysis. Journal of The Electrochemical Society 165, J3059.
  5. Zhang, X.-D., Liu, T., Liu, C., Zheng, D.-S., Huang, J.-M., Liu, Q.-W., Yuan, W.-W., Yin, Y., Huang, L.-R., and Xu, M. (2023). Asymmetric low-frequency pulsed strategy enables ultralong CO2 reduction stability and controllable product selectivity. Journal of the American Chemical Society 145, 2195-2206.
  6. Bui, J.C., Kim, C., Weber, A.Z., and Bell, A.T. (2021). Dynamic boundary layer simulation of pulsed CO2 electrolysis on a copper catalyst. ACS Energy Letters 6, 1181-1188.
  7. DiDomenico, R.C., and Hanrath, T. (2021). Pulse symmetry impacts the C2 product selectivity in pulsed electrochemical CO2 reduction. ACS Energy Letters 7, 292-299.
  8. Xu, Y., Edwards, J.P., Liu, S., Miao, R.K., Huang, J.E., Gabardo, C.M., O’Brien, C.P., Li, J., Sargent, E.H., and Sinton, D. (2021). Self-cleaning CO2 reduction systems: unsteady electrochemical forcing enables stability. ACS Energy Letters 6, 809-815.