(371ad) Multi-Scale Dynamic Techno-Economic Analysis of Pulsed Electrochemical CO2 Reduction Process
AIChE Annual Meeting
2024
2024 AIChE Annual Meeting
Computing and Systems Technology Division
10A: Poster Session: Interactive Session: Systems and Process Design
Tuesday, October 29, 2024 - 3:30pm to 5:00pm
Previous research has predominantly focused on improving stability and selectivity at the electrolyzer scale.5-7 However, optimizing the pulse profile is crucial, considering the cost trade-off associated with pulsed electrolysis and additional expenses incurred by supplementary processes. Therefore, techno-economic analysis (TEA) at the process scale of p-CO2R is essential. Furthermore, observing the performance of the electrolyzer based on various pulse profiles necessitates a multiphysics model.6,8
This study proposed a multiscale model that simultaneously considers pulsed CO2 electrochemical reduction process system and multiphysics within the electrolyzer and implemented optimization of the pulse profile from the perspectives of TEA and life cycle assessment (LCA). To accomplish this, a COMSOL-based multiphysics model and process simulations using Aspen Plus were created, and TEA/LCA was conducted by integrating these two distinct scale models using Matlab. The electrolyzer was configured using an anion exchange membrane (AEM)-based exchange membrane-electrode-assembly. To improve alignment with experimental data, the kinetics parameters of the electrolyzer were fitted using derivative-free optimization (DFO) methods. TEA indicator includes the MSP of products, incorporating additional costs for achieving high purity through separation processes and for the p-CO2R process. The system boundary of LCA is gate-to-gate, with global warming impact (GWI) set as the primary indicator. We integrated the completed multi-scale model with the DFO algorithm to find the optimal pulse profile. Finally, we connected this model with the real-time optimization (RTO) algorithm to implement real-time optimal operation based on a digital twin.
- Obasanjo, C.A., Gao, G., Khiarak, B.N., Pham, T.H., Crane, J., and Dinh, C.-T. (2023). Progress and perspectives of pulse electrolysis for stable electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction. Energy & Fuels 37, 13601-13623.
- Casebolt, R., Levine, K., Suntivich, J., and Hanrath, T. (2021). Pulse check: Potential opportunities in pulsed electrochemical CO2 reduction. Joule 5, 1987-2026.
- Lee, C.W., Cho, N.H., Nam, K.T., Hwang, Y.J., and Min, B.K. (2019). Cyclic two-step electrolysis for stable electrochemical conversion of carbon dioxide to formate. Nature communications 10, 3919.
- Engelbrecht, A., Uhlig, C., Stark, O., Hämmerle, M., Schmid, G., Magori, E., Wiesner-Fleischer, K., Fleischer, M., and Moos, R. (2018). On the electrochemical CO2 reduction at copper sheet electrodes with enhanced long-term stability by pulsed electrolysis. Journal of The Electrochemical Society 165, J3059.
- Zhang, X.-D., Liu, T., Liu, C., Zheng, D.-S., Huang, J.-M., Liu, Q.-W., Yuan, W.-W., Yin, Y., Huang, L.-R., and Xu, M. (2023). Asymmetric low-frequency pulsed strategy enables ultralong CO2 reduction stability and controllable product selectivity. Journal of the American Chemical Society 145, 2195-2206.
- Bui, J.C., Kim, C., Weber, A.Z., and Bell, A.T. (2021). Dynamic boundary layer simulation of pulsed CO2 electrolysis on a copper catalyst. ACS Energy Letters 6, 1181-1188.
- DiDomenico, R.C., and Hanrath, T. (2021). Pulse symmetry impacts the C2 product selectivity in pulsed electrochemical CO2 reduction. ACS Energy Letters 7, 292-299.
- Xu, Y., Edwards, J.P., Liu, S., Miao, R.K., Huang, J.E., Gabardo, C.M., OâBrien, C.P., Li, J., Sargent, E.H., and Sinton, D. (2021). Self-cleaning CO2 reduction systems: unsteady electrochemical forcing enables stability. ACS Energy Letters 6, 809-815.