(402e) Investigation of Advanced Oxidation Processes for Removal of Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) from Aqueous Matrices
AIChE Annual Meeting
2024
2024 AIChE Annual Meeting
Environmental Division
Emerging Treatment Technologies and Characterization for PFAS Contamination II
Tuesday, October 29, 2024 - 4:54pm to 5:15pm
Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are chemical oxidation processes that utilize hydroxyl radicals as the primary removal mechanism. They are classified as either dark or lighted AOPs. As the name suggests, dark AOPs do not utilize UV irradiation to catalyze formation of the hydroxyl radical from parent oxidizers while lighted AOPS utilize some form of UV irradiation to catalyze hydroxyl radical formation. Examples of dark AOPs include Fentonâs Reagent and peroxone, and examples of lighted AOPs include low- and medium-pressure ultraviolet lamps used in conjunction with hydrogen peroxide (LPUV + HP and MPUV + HP). These processes have a long history of successful use in treatment of water contaminated with organic pollutants that are difficult to treat with other processes. While the chemical structure of PFOA makes oxidation of the compound potentially difficult, research on the oxidation of PFOA using optimized AOPs shows promise. One major benefit of AOPs for removal of organic pollutants over methods that concentrate the pollutant is its destruction of the pollutant.
A 3L bench-scale oxidation reactor was used for all experiments with the PFOA concentration set at 500 µg/L and the PFOA analyzed using high performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectroscopy (HPLC-MS/MS). The lighted AOPs investigated utilized a low pressure Hg-vapor lamp, a 200 watt medium pressure Hg-vapor lamp, and a 450 watt medium pressure Hg-vapor lamp. For each medium pressure lamp, both hydrogen peroxide concentration and reactor temperature were varied independently. A novel optimization scheme of hydrogen peroxide dosing was evaluated for optimizing radical production from the H2O2 and managing radical scavenging also from the H2O2. Additionally, experiments using ozone as the primary oxidizer in the system have been conducted to determine the efficacy of ozone in removing PFOA.
The results showed promise for removal of PFOA via MPUV + HP suggesting that AOPs could be effective for removal of PFOA in contaminated waters under proper conditions. Optimizing H2O2 dosing proved useful and a method process designers should consider for removing refractory pollutants and reducing operational costs.