(656g) Investigation of Sorption Kinetics and Isotherm Behaviour of Coal for the Prediction of Enhanced Coalbed Methane (ECBM) Recovery Potentiality
AIChE Annual Meeting
2024
2024 AIChE Annual Meeting
Separations Division
Adsorption Applications for Sustainable Energy and Chemicals
Thursday, October 31, 2024 - 9:48am to 10:06am
Hence, in this alarming scenario, tree plantation, forest preservation, focus towards enhancement of renewable energy production, implementation of energy efficiency technologies etc., can be possible options for CO2 mitigation. However, all these efforts are not sufficient to meet net-zero targets by 2050. Hence, to achieve the net zero emission target, permanent storage of CO2 in geological sites can be considered as the most sustainable solution towards achieving the net zero emission target. Increased interest in CO2 geo-sequestration has resulted in substantial investment by the public and the private sector in developing the requisite technology and determining strategies for CO2 control to be adopted safely and effectively. Some potential carbon sequestration sites include depleted oil reservoirs, saline aquifers, unconventional gas (coal/shale) reservoirs, gas-hydrate reservoirs, basalts etc. Among all the permanent storage options of CO2 in geological sites, CO2 sequestration in coal seams enhanced coalbed methane (ECBM) serves triple purposes simultaneously, i.e., it reduces CO2 emissions by storing CO2 into the coalbeds, recovering high calorific value methane (CBM) as a fuel present in the coalbed as a potential source of energy and also by ensuring the minerâs safety by recovering methane prior to coal mining.
However, the methane (CH4) recovery and CO2 sequestration potential is dependent on several factors, as the gas storage and transport mechanism in the coalbeds differs significantly from the conventional reservoirs. The gas storage mechanism in coal is dominated by physical adsorption, accounting for more than 80% of the total storage capacity and the rest as free gas and solution gas. CO2 sequestration in coalbeds occurs based on the principle of the relatively stronger affinity of CO2 towards coal than CH4. As a result, CO2 gets adsorbed in the coal matrix without being released. Due to its small kinetic diameter compared to CH4, CO2 can enter the smallest pores, adsorb resolutely to the coal surface at a near-liquid density, and store with negligible chances of leakage. Hence, understanding the sorption behaviour of CH4 recovery and CO2 storage on coal is a prerequisite for estimating the ability of a coalbed to store these gases, which must be evaluated experimentally due to the complex physical and chemical structural heterogeneity.
For the present investigation, coal samples were collected from different coal mines/collieries of the Jharia coalfield, India. As a part of the characterization study proximate and ultimate analyses were performed in order to study the elemental composition of the coal. Adsorption isotherm was measured at 30 °C for all the samples. Prior to analysis, moisture-equilibrated (96 to 97% relative humidity at 30 °C) samples were prepared following ASTM D1412/D1412M standard to replicate the reservoir moisture condition. The mass balance equation, real gas law, and equation of state were then employed to calculate the adsorbed gas volume. A total of 9 steps at the incremental pressure of 1000 KPa for CH4 and 7 steps at the incremental pressure of 1000 KPa for CO2 were measured to calculate the isotherm. Pressure drop data was recorded at 1-second intervals in the data acquisition for the evaluation of the adsorption kinetics and fitted to Unipore and modified Unipore model. Approximately 12 hours of time interval was kept between each succeeding pressure step both for the CH4 and CO2 adsorption isotherms.
The results of the proximate analysis show that the coals fixed carbon content ranges from 77.2 to 79.1 % (pdf), and it is linearly increasing from upper (shallow depth) to lower seams (higher depth). The result of the ultimate analysis reveals that the samples exhibit high carbon content, varying within the range 86.5-91.7% (dmmf). The Langmuir volume (daf basis) for CH4 isotherm varies in a comparatively narrow range as compared to CO2 isotherm. It ranges between 19.4-23.8cc/g and 26.6-43.6cc/g (daf) for CH4 and CO2 respectively (Table 1). For both the gases Langmuir volume is higher for upper seam coals. The daf-wise ratio of Langmuir volume between CH4 and CO2 varies between 1:1.37 to 1:1.83The Langmuir pressure for CH4 and CO2 varies between 1608-3646 KPa and 1294-3123KPa respectively.
The depicted adsorption kinetic curve obtained from experimental adsorption resembles a Type I isotherm curve in terms of shape, which increases linearly at the early stage of adsorption, and the curve flattens a bit with time. The experimental adsorption kinetic plots [fractional uptake (Vt/Vâ) versus time (t0.5)] of two representative samples of the studied coals are shown in Figure 1. The kinetic plots show that for all coal samples, the rate curve for CO2 adsorption is steeper at the initial stage, i.e. after the gas is injected into sample cells. However, CO2 takes comparatively less time to reach equilibrium than methane. The slope of the adsorption kinetic plots is determined in order to calculate the precise sorption kinetic rate. A clearly decreasing trend of the slope with the increase in pressure has been observed for both gases, which depicts that the sorption rate has a strong dependency on the pressure. It also depicts that in the initial stage, the adsorption rate is faster due to the availability of a large number of vacant sites. The driving force and the number of available sites decline with the increased contact time. Moreover, adsorbate molecules in the sorbed and bulk phases inhibit each other as the stage approaches equilibrium. The comparatively slower kinetics of CO2 at higher pressure is also attributed to the swelling that occurs during gas injection, which inhibits the CO2 storage and release of CH4.