(699c) NH3 Separation Via ZnCl2-Immobilized Molten Salt (IMS) Membrane – Experimental and Modeling
AIChE Annual Meeting
2024
2024 AIChE Annual Meeting
Separations Division
Membranes for High Temperature Gas and Vapor Separations
Thursday, October 31, 2024 - 1:12pm to 1:33pm
This study systematically explores the performance of ZnCl2 immobilized molten salt (IMS) membranes, both theoretically and experimentally, at high pressures for separating NH3 from a mixture of N2 and H2. Firstly, the ZnCl2 IMS membrane's separation characteristics were experimentally determined with a 1 µm pore-sized wire mesh support when exposed to pure and mixed gases at 300 °C and 100 - 350 kPa. The membranes were synthesized in situ via the direct deposition method and were characterized by a 50 µm thickness. When exposed to a single gas, the membranes exhibit NH3 permeance of ~211 GPU, with both NH3/N2 and NH3/H2 ideal selectivities > 107 at 100 kPa. In the case of binary mixtures, NH3 permeance within the range of 6000 to 7000 GPU was attained at a feed NH3 partial pressure of ~3 kPa. Secondly, the theoretical part of this study employed a mathematical model initially introduced by Xu et al. [5] to examine the facilitated transport mechanisms of NH3 across ZnCl2 IMS membranes. The mathematical model was fit to experimentally measured NH3 fluxes as a function of NH3 partial pressure (~10 to ~100 kPa) and membrane thicknesses (50 µm, 80 µm [4], and 200 µm [6]) to deduce the kinetic and thermodynamic parameters related to the permeation of NH3 through the membrane. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) between model and experimental data was less than 5%.
In general, even though ZnCl2 salt is corrosive to stainless steel, the membrane was stable for at least 640 h under different feed mixtures with no significant performance loss. In addition, the membrane exhibited sustained mechanical stability and selectivity up to 350 kPa, underscoring its potential suitability for high-pressure systems.
References
[1] A.I. Osman, Z. Chen, A.M. Elgarahy, M. Farghali, I.M.A. Mohamed, A.K. Priya, H.B. Hawash, P.-S. Yap, Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research (2024) 2400011.
[2] C. Smith, A.K. Hill, L. Torrente-Murciano, Energy Environ Sci 13 (2020) 331â344.
[3] H. Liu, Ammonia Synthesis Catalysts (2013).
[4] M. Adejumo, L. Oleksy, S. Liguori, Chemical Engineering Journal 479 (2024) 147434.
[5] H. Xu, S.G. Pate, C.P. OâBrien, Chemical Engineering Journal 460 (2023) 141728.
[6] Daniel V. Laciak, Guido P. Pez, Peter M. Burban, Journal of Membrane Science, (1992), Volume 65, Issues 1â2, Pages 31-38.