(729e) Screening Cobalt-Based Single Atom Alloy Catalysts for Low-Temperature Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis | AIChE

(729e) Screening Cobalt-Based Single Atom Alloy Catalysts for Low-Temperature Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis

Authors 

El Berch, J. - Presenter, University of Pittsburgh
Ahmadov, R., University of Rochester
Porosoff, M., University of Rochester
Mpourmpakis, G., University of Pittsburgh
To reach net-zero CO2 emissions by 2050, the installed carbon capture, utilization, and sequestration capacity needs to increase ~15 times by 20301. Among the CO2 utilization applications, the production of synthetic fuel (also known as synfuel) has the highest CO­2 use capacity due to the vast worldwide energy demands2. Moreover, synfuels can supply low-carbon alternatives to sectors not yet ready for electrification, such as aviation and maritime3. One of the main CO2-synfuel production routes consists of sequentially pairing the Reverse Water-Gas Shift (RWGS, CO2 + H2 ↔ CO + H2O) with Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis (FTS, CO + 2H2 → -(CH2)- + H2O)4. One drawback of this pathway is the separation of the CO2 effluent from the RWGS step, as typical FTS catalysts are also active for the Sabatier reaction (CO2 + 4H2 → CH4 + 2H2O)5. Considering CO2 activation requires high temperatures, usually above 300 °C 6, low-temperature (LT) FTS (~200 °C) can reactively separate the CO/CO2 inlet.

Cobalt is the most popular LT-FTS catalyst, often enhanced by doping (or promoting) with precious metals7. In our previous work, Ru-doped Co Single Atom Alloys (SAAs), in which isolated Ru atoms are dispersed on the Co surface, were investigated for LT-FTS. The Ru-Co SAA catalyst showed enhanced reducibility and improved efficiency in the use of Ru (Co:Ru atomic ratio decreased ~20 fold compared to co-impregnated catalysts)8. In this work, we search for cost-effective alternatives for Ru that result in active LT-FTS catalysts by using density functional theory to screen various Co-based SAAs. The overall catalytic performance is evaluated by comparing the energetics of three FTS elementary steps: 1) ­CH2 coupling (2CH2 → C2H4) to probe the formation of long-chain hydrocarbons; 2) CH3 hydrogenation (CH3 + H → CH4) to evaluate the formation of undesired methane; and 3) CH3 dissociation (CH3 → CH2 + H) to gauge the likelihood of finding low-saturated carbon chains. Among the tested dopants, Re is identified as a cost-efficient alternative to Ru, with similar reaction energetics, whereas, V is found to have the most favorable energetics for long-chain hydrocarbons (unfavorable CH4 formation and low CH2 coupling barriers). The selectivity predictions on these two SAAs are experimentally validated by temperature-programmed reactor studies. Finally, fitted linear scaling relationships using common (de)hydrogenation descriptors show deviations with varying adsorption configurations, suggesting the importance of site-sensitive descriptors. Overall, this work introduces a framework for the effective screening of SAA candidates in complex multi-step reactions.

References

1. International Energy Agency, Capacity of current and planned large-scale CO2 capture projects vs. the Net Zero Scenario, 2020-2030. Paris https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/capacity-of-current-and-planned-large-scale-co2-capture-projects-vs-the-net-zero-scenario-2020-2030, 2023.

2. International Energy Agency Putting CO2 to Use; 2019.

3. Anika, O. C.; Nnabuife, S. G.; Bello, A.; Okoroafor, E. R.; Kuang, B.; Villa, R., Prospects of low and zero-carbon renewable fuels in 1.5-degree net zero emission actualisation by 2050: A critical review. Carbon Capture Science & Technology 2022, 5, 100072.

4. Porosoff, M. D.; Yan, B.; Chen, J. G., Catalytic reduction of CO2 by H2 for synthesis of CO, methanol and hydrocarbons: challenges and opportunities. Energy & Environmental Science 2016, 9 (1), 62-73.

5. Visconti, C. G.; Martinelli, M.; Falbo, L.; Fratalocchi, L.; Lietti, L., CO2 hydrogenation to hydrocarbons over Co and Fe-based Fischer-Tropsch catalysts. Catalysis Today 2016, 277, 161-170.

6. Spennati, E.; Garbarino, G.; Savio, L.; Vattuone, L.; Riani, P.; Busca, G., CO2 methanation vs reverse WGS activity on Co/γ-Al2O3 catalysts at atmospheric pressure: effect of cobalt loading and silica addition on selectivity and stability. Catalysis Today 2023, 420, 114164.

7. Khodakov, A. Y.; Chu, W.; Fongarland, P., Advances in the Development of Novel Cobalt Fischer−Tropsch Catalysts for Synthesis of Long-Chain Hydrocarbons and Clean Fuels. Chemical Reviews 2007, 107 (5), 1692-1744.

8. Liu, R.; El Berch, J. N.; House, S.; Meil, S. W.; Mpourmpakis, G.; Porosoff, M. D., Reactive Separations of CO/CO2 mixtures over Ru–Co Single Atom Alloys. ACS Catalysis 2023, 13 (4), 2449-2461.