(18d) The Techno-Economic Prospects of Using Piperazine for Carbon Dioxide Removal from Natural Gas
AIChE Spring Meeting and Global Congress on Process Safety
2020
2020 Virtual Spring Meeting and 16th GCPS
20th Topical Conference on Gas Utilization
Advances in Gas Processing Design, Purification, and Separation
Tuesday, August 18, 2020 - 11:45am to 12:00pm
The core objective of this work is to evaluate the potential of using Piperazine against the most common Amines which are used nowadays. This article presents a novel investigations of the most significant effective parameters for processing Piperazine, and their influences on the plant efficiency and investment cost. And also has demonstrated that, choosing Piperazine (30%wt) could reduce more than 10% of the operating cost and 4% of the equipment cost in the Acid Gas Removal Unit against the other solvents.
Regarding the methodology, firstly six solvents had been identified to be investigated, then an acceptable range of concentrations (acceptable range of concentrations is that attain solvent stability, and reduce foaming tendency and corrosion rates of the solvent) for each solvent is defined. Next, a design of the facilities at each concentration for the six solvents are simulated using ASPEN HYSYS software. After that, the most economical concentration of each solvent is selected, and then the chosen concentrations are compared in performance and economic point of view.
Results show that Piperazine (30% wt.) is the most effective solvent, which performs Amine loading of 0.8 mol-CO2absorbed/mol-Amine at the specified operating conditions. Moreover it has preceded other alternatives in both operating and equipment cost points of view. Results also show that, the concentration of the Amines has significant effect on the operating cost of this unit: some of them exhibit increasingly, others decreasingly and others even have inflection point (concave up curve); this behavior is due to the fluctuation of the operating cost which concerns the reboiler duty cost and the makeup cost. For each solvent, there is a certain limit to which distillation column can recover the Amine concentration; because reboiler temperature cannot exceed the degradation temperature of the solvent; hence the makeup must carry the shortening of the distillation to achieve the targeted Amine-water solution concentration.
Checkout
This paper has an Extended Abstract file available; you must purchase the conference proceedings to access it.
Do you already own this?
Log In for instructions on accessing this content.
Pricing
Individuals
2020 Virtual Spring Meeting and 16th GCPS
AIChE Pro Members | $150.00 |
Employees of CCPS Member Companies | $150.00 |
AIChE Graduate Student Members | Free |
AIChE Undergraduate Student Members | Free |
AIChE Explorer Members | $225.00 |
Non-Members | $225.00 |
20th Topical Conference on Gas Utilization only
AIChE Pro Members | $100.00 |
Fuels and Petrochemicals Division Members | Free |
AIChE Graduate Student Members | Free |
AIChE Undergraduate Student Members | Free |
AIChE Explorer Members | $150.00 |
Non-Members | $150.00 |