Towards a New Approach How to Respond to the Emergency with Crisis Using SSM
CCPS Global Summit on Process Safety
2017
4th Global Summit on Process Safety
2017 Global Summit on Process Safety
Human Factors II
Tuesday, September 12, 2017 - 5:05pm to 5:30pm
Checkland (1981, 1990) proposes âSoft Systems Methodology: SSMâ as the guideline to deal with ill structured or ill defined problematic situation, which could be introduced subjectivity or tacit dimension rigorously. The central concept of this thought, I think, would be âaccommodationâ which means âto live with different worldviews based on co-owned common tacit knowledgeâ, rather than âconsensusâ which means to share the common worldviews. Nonaka (1994) also suggested this kind of sharing tacit knowledge in his theory of knowledge management as a case of Japanese innovation process.
It seems to me that this kind of sharing tacit knowledge of âaccommodationâ will be the condition to carry out the sensemaking to the situation of crisis which Weick referred. Because, while the case of emergency with crisis, it is impossible to adapt the situation analytically but it is necessary to coherent with situation proactively and to carry out sensemaking for action intuitionally on the condition of âaccommodationâ beforehand.
The SSM workshop can be useful tool for co-owning the tacit knowledge through seeking âaccommodationâ.
In this session we propose three parts; firstly we will explain the importance of âaccommodationâ to response to emergency with crisis theoretically (30min.), secondary we will show you some example using few cases namely 3.11 disaster nursing, Fukushima nuclear reactor accident and SSM team emergency response workshop in Mizushima chemical plant complex (30min.), and finally in the Q & A session (30min.) all the participants will discuss how to respond to emergency with crisis freely. (total 90min.)