Project 313: RBPS Implementation Guide
Project Scope
We are seeking Risk Based Process Safety (RBPS) success stories to be incorporated into the RBPS Implementation Guide. Please use the template provided to submit a success story and email your completed form to RBPS-Story@aiche.org. All submitted stories will be reviewed by the project chairs and you will be contacted to ensure you agree with the final contents to be included.
RBPS Story Template
Since Guidelines for Risk Based Process Safety was first published in 2007 it has served as the reference for theory and concepts related to Risk Based Process Safety (RBPS). The purpose of Guidelines for Risk Based Process Safety is to help organizations design and implement more effective process safety management systems by providing methods and ideas on how to (1) design a process safety management system, (2) correct a deficient process safety management system, or (3) improve process safety management practices. A risk-based approach reduces the potential for assigning an undue number of resources to manage lower-risk activities, thereby freeing up resources for tasks that address higher-risk activities. The theoretical groundwork developed in Guidelines for Risk Based Process Safety serves as the basis for the Risk Based Process Safety Implementation Guide.
The Implementation Guide will
- Provide real-world practices that have been developed by CCPS member companies as effective applications for risk management.
- Complement Guidelines for Risk Based Process Safety with success stories from CCPS Member companies, providing practical insights into strategies and practices that have proven effective when applying the RBPS Elements.
- Provide examples of systems and programs that have been deployed and helped prevent incidents from happening, for each of the Elements and Pillars. These are proven examples of management systems and processes that have improved the effectiveness of process safety at companies and throughout industry. This reference will provide organizations with easy access to these best practices so they can incorporate or adapt based on their site or company needs. Each example will present the issue, provide details on the solutions that were implemented, discuss the resources required, highlight challenges to implementation, and show how those challenges were overcome. These examples will help us meet our collective goal of “A World without Process Safety IncidentsTM.”
This book will differ from many CCPS books, in that it will showcase and highlight success stories that can be replicated, rather than sharing information and learnings from incidents to prevent further incidents from occurring. The Implementation Guide will focus on positive outcomes achieved by the implementation of process safety programs related to the Elements and Pillars of RBPS.
This book will seek to provide the answer to one question – “What went right?”
Accepting Volunteers
Project Status
Status Updated On
Project 321: Spinoffs and Carveouts
Project Scope
The 2010 book on mergers and acquisitions did not fully cover Spinoffs and Carveouts of business divisions into separate new entities. The Process Safety knowledge does not transfer easily in this situation. The product of this project is likely to be a focused Monograph, but may morph into a book volume if necessary. Note: Carve out leads to new owners whereas spinoff is legal divestiture but same owners or stockholders. Volunteer ask: Process safety strength, having first-hand experience in either of the two types of divestitures in focus.
Accepting Volunteers
Project Status
Project 323: Contract Manufacturing
Project Scope
This practice is common in many industries such as Food, Pharmaceuticals, Fine Chemicals, etc. During a recent incident investigation, the US Chemical Safety Board reviewed the available literature around the world and did not find sufficient up to date guidance on this topic of Contract or Toll manufacturing. We will be updating the 2000 book with a focused monograph that will at a minimum address the deficiencies in the literature identified by CSB. We will also review the latest best practices and include them in the guidance. Volunteer ask: Process safety strength, with contract manufacturing knowledge and experience.
Accepting Volunteers
Project Status
Project 338 Journey to Implementing RBPS - First Steps
Project Scope
This monograph will help engineers and process safety professionals, who are new to Risk Based Process Safety (RBPS) and/or are just starting to implement RBPS in their workplace, to begin their process safety journey. The document will include guidance for developing and implementing some recommended first key management systems, to begin the journey to RBPS.
Accepting Volunteers
Project Status
Project 339 Competency Development Planning for PS Practitioners and PS Line Managers
Project Scope
Create a monograph providing guidance for leaders, especially those who are non-Process Safety Professionals, in developing competency in the Process Safety Professionals they manage. Developing and maintaining process safety competency encompasses three interrelated actions: continuously improving knowledge and competency, ensuring that appropriate information is available to people who need it, and consistently applying what has been learned.
In many instances, Process Safety Professionals are managed by Process Engineers, other discipline engineers, EHS professionals, and even non-technical professionals. It can be challenging for non-Process Safety Professionals to know how to support building process safety competency as this is not their area of expertise. While aimed at non-Process Safety Professionals, this monograph will also guide Process Safety Professionals in supporting process safety competence development.
This monograph will be developed as a “How-To Guide” for the Guidelines for Defining Process Safety Competency Requirements, 1st Edition, which describes process safety roles and competency needs.
Accepting Volunteers
Project Status
Project 340 Addressing High Consequence Low Probability Scenarios within a Risk Based Process Safety Framework
Project Scope
Produce a book describing methods that organizations could apply to minimize the occurrence of High Consequence Low Probability events. As organizations work to best manage Process Safety risks, while working towards a vision of a world without Process Safety incidents, the occurrence of events associated with High Consequences must be the first to be eliminated. High Consequence, Low Probability Scenarios (HCLPs) can be much more difficult to manage when compared to other Process Safety risks, making the elimination of this class of events even more difficult to achieve. Further, HCLPs also are likely to result in potential reputational and financial solvency issues which may further impact the organization beyond the actual event, creating an additional driver for their elimination.
Accepting Volunteers
Project Status
Project 341 Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures 4th Edition
Project Scope
Update “Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures 3rd Edition” 2008. Effective hazard evaluation plays a crucial role in maintaining workplace safety and preventing work-related illnesses and injuries. The book “Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures, 3rd Edition” provides process engineers with effective methodologies to identify process hazards. It includes worked examples, references, and updated information, making it a valuable resource. Since its publication in 2008, there have been advancements in topics such as Combustible Dust PHA, Cyber PHA, and Safer Technology Alternatives Assessment (STAA). In addition, prompted by COVID-19 and the use of global work teams, more PHAs are being conducted remotely. Updating this book would ensure that it remains relevant and comprehensive in addressing modern safety challenges.
Accepting Volunteers
Project Status
Project 276: Safe Work Practices
Project ID
Project Scope
The objective of Project 276 is to develop an integrated set of policies, procedures, permits, and other systems that are designed to manage risks associated with non-routine activities. Examples of these activities include performing hot work, opening process vessels or lines, and entering a confined space.
To date, a Safe Work Practice (SWP) document has been developed for hot work authorization, line breaking/isolation, lockout/tagout (control of energy hazards), and confined space entry.
Accepting Volunteers
Project Status
AMS Committee ID
Project 289: Process Safety Golden Rules and Key Principles
Project ID
Project Scope
One of the most critical aspects of Process Safety is to know the hazards that one is dealing with, yet in too many incidents we realize that there was a knowledge gap in understanding the hazards. The goal of this project is to identify two to three technologies (e. g. FCC operations, Chlorine Chemistry, Nitration Chemistry, Peroxides, Combustible Dust, etc..) that have seen numerous incidents, have high hazards, and/or are highly utilized and Organize a team of process safety and process technology experts to develop a set of rules and tenants that serve the foundation for process safety.
The rules and tenants are based on absolute statements to address the inherent hazards associated with the process technology (e.g. One should never mix A and B together, One should always check grounding connections, etc). The goal is to add to these initial technologies over time and develop an online library and also posters and other communication channels to communicate the message to a broad range of audiences (engineers, operations personnel, management).
This product will use technology as the foundation platform.
We are looking for expertise on: Ammonia, Ethylene Oxide, FCCU, and Hydrotreating
Accepting Volunteers
Project Status
Project 301: Gamification
Project Scope
This is a regional project being executed in Brazil and rest of the Latin America. The primary product will be in Portuguese and Spanish. We will use the game theory to develop tools for developing skills, drive innovation in Process Safety, motivating people to change behaviors, etc.
Accepting Volunteers
Project Status
Project 303: Guidelines for Chemical Reactivity Evaluation & Application to Process Design 2nd Ed.
Project Scope
There are many new products and tools since the first edition was published in 1995. This includes predicting hazards using thermodynamic calculations, Chemical Reactivity Worksheet(CRW), CHETAH, CAMEO etc. new calorimetry screening methods are now available. New topics may include safe operating limit and storage condition assessments. Several case studies are now available and will be added.
We are looking for R&D professionals, process development & reaction safety experts along with engineers & designers with chemical reactivity expertise.
Accepting Volunteers
Project Status
Project 313: RBPS Implementation Guide
Project Scope
We are seeking Risk Based Process Safety (RBPS) success stories to be incorporated into the RBPS Implementation Guide. Please use the template provided to submit a success story and email your completed form to RBPS-Story@aiche.org. All submitted stories will be reviewed by the project chairs and you will be contacted to ensure you agree with the final contents to be included.
RBPS Story Template
Since Guidelines for Risk Based Process Safety was first published in 2007 it has served as the reference for theory and concepts related to Risk Based Process Safety (RBPS). The purpose of Guidelines for Risk Based Process Safety is to help organizations design and implement more effective process safety management systems by providing methods and ideas on how to (1) design a process safety management system, (2) correct a deficient process safety management system, or (3) improve process safety management practices. A risk-based approach reduces the potential for assigning an undue number of resources to manage lower-risk activities, thereby freeing up resources for tasks that address higher-risk activities. The theoretical groundwork developed in Guidelines for Risk Based Process Safety serves as the basis for the Risk Based Process Safety Implementation Guide.
The Implementation Guide will
- Provide real-world practices that have been developed by CCPS member companies as effective applications for risk management.
- Complement Guidelines for Risk Based Process Safety with success stories from CCPS Member companies, providing practical insights into strategies and practices that have proven effective when applying the RBPS Elements.
- Provide examples of systems and programs that have been deployed and helped prevent incidents from happening, for each of the Elements and Pillars. These are proven examples of management systems and processes that have improved the effectiveness of process safety at companies and throughout industry. This reference will provide organizations with easy access to these best practices so they can incorporate or adapt based on their site or company needs. Each example will present the issue, provide details on the solutions that were implemented, discuss the resources required, highlight challenges to implementation, and show how those challenges were overcome. These examples will help us meet our collective goal of “A World without Process Safety IncidentsTM.”
This book will differ from many CCPS books, in that it will showcase and highlight success stories that can be replicated, rather than sharing information and learnings from incidents to prevent further incidents from occurring. The Implementation Guide will focus on positive outcomes achieved by the implementation of process safety programs related to the Elements and Pillars of RBPS.
This book will seek to provide the answer to one question – “What went right?”
Accepting Volunteers
Project Status
Status Updated On
Project 321: Spinoffs and Carveouts
Project Scope
The 2010 book on mergers and acquisitions did not fully cover Spinoffs and Carveouts of business divisions into separate new entities. The Process Safety knowledge does not transfer easily in this situation. The product of this project is likely to be a focused Monograph, but may morph into a book volume if necessary. Note: Carve out leads to new owners whereas spinoff is legal divestiture but same owners or stockholders. Volunteer ask: Process safety strength, having first-hand experience in either of the two types of divestitures in focus.
Accepting Volunteers
Project Status
Project 323: Contract Manufacturing
Project Scope
This practice is common in many industries such as Food, Pharmaceuticals, Fine Chemicals, etc. During a recent incident investigation, the US Chemical Safety Board reviewed the available literature around the world and did not find sufficient up to date guidance on this topic of Contract or Toll manufacturing. We will be updating the 2000 book with a focused monograph that will at a minimum address the deficiencies in the literature identified by CSB. We will also review the latest best practices and include them in the guidance. Volunteer ask: Process safety strength, with contract manufacturing knowledge and experience.
Accepting Volunteers
Project Status
Project 338 Journey to Implementing RBPS - First Steps
Project Scope
This monograph will help engineers and process safety professionals, who are new to Risk Based Process Safety (RBPS) and/or are just starting to implement RBPS in their workplace, to begin their process safety journey. The document will include guidance for developing and implementing some recommended first key management systems, to begin the journey to RBPS.
Accepting Volunteers
Project Status
Project 339 Competency Development Planning for PS Practitioners and PS Line Managers
Project Scope
Create a monograph providing guidance for leaders, especially those who are non-Process Safety Professionals, in developing competency in the Process Safety Professionals they manage. Developing and maintaining process safety competency encompasses three interrelated actions: continuously improving knowledge and competency, ensuring that appropriate information is available to people who need it, and consistently applying what has been learned.
In many instances, Process Safety Professionals are managed by Process Engineers, other discipline engineers, EHS professionals, and even non-technical professionals. It can be challenging for non-Process Safety Professionals to know how to support building process safety competency as this is not their area of expertise. While aimed at non-Process Safety Professionals, this monograph will also guide Process Safety Professionals in supporting process safety competence development.
This monograph will be developed as a “How-To Guide” for the Guidelines for Defining Process Safety Competency Requirements, 1st Edition, which describes process safety roles and competency needs.
Accepting Volunteers
Project Status
Project 340 Addressing High Consequence Low Probability Scenarios within a Risk Based Process Safety Framework
Project Scope
Produce a book describing methods that organizations could apply to minimize the occurrence of High Consequence Low Probability events. As organizations work to best manage Process Safety risks, while working towards a vision of a world without Process Safety incidents, the occurrence of events associated with High Consequences must be the first to be eliminated. High Consequence, Low Probability Scenarios (HCLPs) can be much more difficult to manage when compared to other Process Safety risks, making the elimination of this class of events even more difficult to achieve. Further, HCLPs also are likely to result in potential reputational and financial solvency issues which may further impact the organization beyond the actual event, creating an additional driver for their elimination.
Accepting Volunteers
Project Status
Project 341 Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures 4th Edition
Project Scope
Update “Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures 3rd Edition” 2008. Effective hazard evaluation plays a crucial role in maintaining workplace safety and preventing work-related illnesses and injuries. The book “Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures, 3rd Edition” provides process engineers with effective methodologies to identify process hazards. It includes worked examples, references, and updated information, making it a valuable resource. Since its publication in 2008, there have been advancements in topics such as Combustible Dust PHA, Cyber PHA, and Safer Technology Alternatives Assessment (STAA). In addition, prompted by COVID-19 and the use of global work teams, more PHAs are being conducted remotely. Updating this book would ensure that it remains relevant and comprehensive in addressing modern safety challenges.