(340f) Effect of Fuel Type and Emission Control on Mobile Emissions from Three School Buses Using the Rowan Composite School Bus Test Cycle | AIChE

(340f) Effect of Fuel Type and Emission Control on Mobile Emissions from Three School Buses Using the Rowan Composite School Bus Test Cycle

Authors 

Martinez, D. - Presenter, Rowan University
Hesketh, R. - Presenter, Rowan University
Bhatia, K. - Presenter, Rowan University
Marchese, A. - Presenter, Rowan University


New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT) sponsored a research study at Rowan University to develop strategies for reducing diesel emissions from mobile sources such as school buses and class 8 trucks. The results of mobile school bus testing that has been performed to quantify the emission reduction capabilities of various alternative fuels and aftertreatment devices will be presented. The fuels tests were B20/#2 diesel, ultra low sulfur diesel (ULSD), and B20/ULSD. The aftertreatment devices are particulate filters from Johnson Matthey and Lubrizol and a diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC) from Nett Technologies. Three school buses equipped with an International T444E, an International DT466E, and a Cummins 5.9L ISB engine were instrumented and tested at the Aberdeen Test Center at the Aberdeen Proving Grounds in Maryland. Exhaust gas emission measurements were made using a Semtech-D mobile emissions analyzer to measure CO, CO2, NO2, NO, O2, and unburned hydrocarbons, along with a Sensors PM-300 to measure particulate matter (PM). In addition to the exhaust emissions measurements, operating parameters such as instantaneous vehicle speed, engine speed, percent load and fuel flow rate were acquired from the engine electronic control module (ECM) during testing. To ensure repeatability of testing under conditions that accurately reproduce actual school bus operating conditions, a new composite mobile school bus cycle was developed. The cycle was developed by acquiring Global Positioning System (GPS) data from actual school bus routes from 5 different municipalities within the state of New Jersey. For all three buses, HC emissions were significantly reduced for each of the three alternative fuels tested. Emission reductions of NOx, PM and CO varied for each bus tested. For example, both the ULSD and the B20/#2 diesel blend reduced CO and PM emissions by over 30% for the T444E and Cummins engines. The ULSD/B20 blend reduced CO and PM emissions by 20% to 50% for the T444E and DT466E engines. Generally, the B20 blends resulted in slight increases in NOx emissions, with the exception of the DT466E engine with B20/ULSD blend, which resulted in decreased NOx emissions. Results from the exhaust after treatment devices showed that the Johnson Matthey CRT reduced PM and CO emissions from 48%-79% and HC by 88%-95%. NOX emissions were also reduced on the average of about 10%. The Nett Technologies DOC was capable of reducing the HC by 64% in the two International engines and 39% in the Cummins engine. CO was reduced using the Nett DOC by 74-85%. PM was reduced by over 20% per bin size and the corrected NOX by 6%. The Lubrizol Purifilter had the maximum reduction in PM for each engine and bin size. However, the Purifilter only provided minor CO reductions.