(758a) Hydrocarbon Formation Model of Slurry-Phase Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis | AIChE

(758a) Hydrocarbon Formation Model of Slurry-Phase Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis

Authors 

Olewski, T. - Presenter, Faculty of Process and Environmental Engineering
Nowicki, L. - Presenter, Technical University of Lodz, Faculty of Process & Environmental Engineering

Three
different approaches to model hydrocarbon formation rates of Fischer-Tropsch
synthesis have been compared. The model parameters have been determined from experimental
data obtained in a stirred tank slurry reactor (STSR) over a wide range
of process conditions (temperature: 220, 240 and 260°C; pressure: 8, 15 and 25 bar; feed composition, H2/CO ratio: 2/3 or 2/1; gas space
velocity: 0.5-23.5 NL/g-Fe/h) on a precipitated iron catalyst
(100 Fe/4.3 Cu/4.1 K/25 SiO2). These
data are characterized by non-straight line hydrocarbon products distribution, and
decrease of 1-olefin with simultaneous increase of n-paraffin and 2-olefin selectivities
with conversion and carbon number. The proposed models provide
predictions of concentrations of linear paraffins and linear 1- and 2-olefins..

All
considered models assume that the chain growth initiates on an active sites of the
catalyst by hydrogenation of adsorbed monomer (CH2,s) to
adsorbed methyl group (CH3,s). Chain propagation occurs via
insertion of adsorbed monomer into adsorbed alkyl species (CnH2n+1,s),
which can terminate to n-paraffin (CnH2n+2) by
hydrogenation, and to 1-olefin (1-CnH2n) or
2-olefin (2-CnH2n) by dehydrogenation. The a-
and b-olefins (1- and 2-olefins) are considered separately in these
kinetic models. All models assume that the 1-olefin can readsorb and form the
adsorbed alkyl species, which can subsequently propagate or terminate.

The first
model is based on that proposed by Zimmerman et al. (Zimmerman, 1990; Zimmerman
et al., 1992). It assumes two types of active sites (s1 and s2)
on the catalyst surface. Chain initiation, propagation and termination to
products as well as 1-olefin readsorption take place on the first type of
active sites on the catalyst surface. The 1-olefin can readsorb also on the
second type of active sites, different than those on which initiation and
propagation occur, leading to adsorbed alkyl species (CnH2n+1,s2).
The latter species can also terminate to n-paraffin by hydrogenation and to
1-olefin or 2-olefin by dehydrogenation. There is no propagation on the second
type of site. This represents an extension of the original model proposed by
Zimmerman et al. (1992).

The second
approach is based on the selectivity model developed by Van der Laan and
Beenackers (1998). They simplified the Zimmerman's model by considering only
one type of sites. This model has been called ?olefin readsorption product
distribution model? (ORPDM). The original ORPDM considers total olefin
formation, i.e. it does not treat formation of 1- and 2-olefins separately. In this
work the ORPDM model has been modified by considering formation of both 1- and
2-olefins separately.

The third
selectivity model tested in this work was based on the model developed by
Nowicki et al. (Nowicki, 2000; Nowicki et al., 2001; Nowicki and Bukur, 2001)
and will be referred here as Nowicki model. Nowicki's model is an extension of
the Zimmerman's model which includes propagation on the second type of active
sites and considers formation of 2-olefins as well. Chain growth is initiated
only on the first type of active sites by hydrogenation of adsorbed monomer (CH2,s1)
to adsorbed methyl group (CH3,s1). Termination to
2-olefins occurs only on the second type of active sites.

In all models, the formation of
C1 and C2 products is considered separately therefore
their rate constants are different than others. Also, an assumption has been
made that the reaction rate of olefin formation is proportional to its partial
pressure in the gas phase and that the reactor behaves as a perfectly mixed
flow reactor.

A
non-negative values for all model parameters have been obtained and the best
fit of experimental data was obtained for the Nowicki's model, and the worst
for the ORPDM. However, the differences in predictions between these models are
less then 6%. Therefore the ORPDM may be considered as the most preferred model
due to its simplicity (i.e. lower number of kinetic parameters).

The
Levenberg-Marquardt and the trust-region reflective Newton large-scale (LS)
method were successfully employed for minimization of the objective function
and kinetic parameter estimation. The 95% confidence intervals of the
parameters have been obtained.

 

References

Nowicki, L., Modelowanie
kinetyki reakcji uwodornienia tlenków wêgla na wybranych typach katalizatorów w
uk³adzie gaz-ciecz-cia³o sta³e
, £ód?: Politechnika £ódzka (2000)

Nowicki, L.,
Ledakowicz, S., Bukur, D.B., Chem. Eng. Sci., 56, 1175-1180
(2001)

Nowicki, L. and Bukur, D.B., Studies in Surface Science and
Catalysis
, 136, J. J. Spivey, E. Iglesia and T. H. Fleisch
(Editors), 2001 Elsevier Science B.V., pp. 123-128 (2001)

Van der Laan, G.P. and Beenackers, A.A.C.M., Studies in Surface
Science and Catalysis
, 119, 179 (1998)

Zimmerman, W. H., ?Kinetic Modeling of the Fischer-Tropsch
Synthesis?
, Ph.D. dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 1990

Zimmerman,
W., D.B. Bukur and S. Ledakowicz, Chem. Eng. Sci., 47, 2707
(1992)

 

Key words

Fischer-Tropsch,
kinetic modeling