(742d) 2-Step Plasma-Enhanced CVD for Low-Temperature Fabrication of Silica Membranes with High Gas-Separation Performance | AIChE

(742d) 2-Step Plasma-Enhanced CVD for Low-Temperature Fabrication of Silica Membranes with High Gas-Separation Performance

Authors 

Shigemoto, H. - Presenter, Hiroshima University
Kanezashi, M. - Presenter, Hiroshima University
Yoshioka, T. - Presenter, Hiroshima University


Amorphous silica network structure allows permeation of the smallest molecules such as helium (kinetic diameter: 0.26 nm) and hydrogen (0.289 nm), but not larger molecules such as nitrogen (0.364 nm).1) Since silica membranes for hydrogen separation were first reported in 1989 by thermal CVD2) and in 1990 by sol-gel processing3), porous silica membranes have drawn a great deal of attention. In general, thermal CVD membranes show high selectivity, while sol-gel silica membranes show high permeability. Although plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) has a great advantage of low temperature synthesis and has been extensively investigated in production of semi-conductors, only a limited number of papers were reported for gas separation.4-6) To date, using silicon-precursors, including tetraethoxysilane (TEOS)4), tetramethyldisilazane5), and hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDSO)6), silica membranes have been prepared on polycarbonate4) and alumina5,6) porous supports, and have been applied for pervaporartion4) and gas separation5,6). In this paper, sol-gel derived intermediate layers were prepared on cylindrical a-alumina supports, and subjected to PECVD using hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDSO). Gas permeability and thermal stability of plasma CVD membranes were evaluated.

PECVD was carried out in a flow-type reactor equipped with an RF coil induced at 13.56 MHz, and the gas permeation rate was measured in-situ without removal of the membranes from the PECVD apparatus. Hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDSO) in a mole fraction of 7% was fed under an argon flow rate of 10 ccm at a pressure of ~120Pa. Nanoporous TiO2/a-Al2O3 membranes with average pore sizes of 4 nm were used as substrates for PECVD.

The single gas permeances of He (kinetic diameter: 0.26 nm), N2 (0.36 nm) and SF6 (0.55 nm) of Ar-CVD membranes, which were fabricated under Ar-flow in PECVD with TiO2 nanoporous supports decreased on the order of 10-2-10-3 during the initial 10-20 minutes, and then approached steady values, showing a He permeance of 6 x 10-9 mol/(m2 s Pa) with a permeance ratio of 200 for He/SF6 and 7 for He/N2 at 25 °C.

After the Ar-CVD membrane was treated by O2-CVD for 5 min in the second step of the 2-step membrane process, the permeance ratio for He/N2 and He/SF6 of the 2-step membrane increased up to 7,800 and 27,000, respectively. The 2-step CVD process was found to drastically increase the separation performance. Increased selectivity for small molecules is caused by the reduced pore sizes of the 2-step CVD membrane. Through the second step (O2-CVD), the plasma-polymerized layer formed during Ar-CVD was converted to a silica-rich inorganic layer. The more rigid structure, which allowed less vibration of the network, led to high selectivity for hydrogen over nitrogen. In particular, the permeance ratio of He over H2 was increased from 0.79 to 5.8 and 17 after second step reaction of 5 and 30 min, respectively. It should be noted that most polymers showed the separation factor for He/H2 as approximate unity, and He/H2 selectivities of inorganic membranes, including silica membranes fabricated by thermal CVD, were approximately several and less than 10 at maximum. Herein, it was confirmed that the present 2-step PECVD membrane showed an extremely high separation factor for He over H2, which was also reproducible. Therefore, it is suggested that the Ar-CVD plasma polymerized layer, which is flexible and easy to form, was converted under O2-CVD to a silica-rich phase with a high selective performance.

References:

1) Tsuru, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 46 (2008) 349. 2) Gavalas et al., Chem. Eng. Sci. 44 (1989) 1829. 3) Kitao et al., MAKU (Membrane) 15 (1990) 222. [4] C-H. Lo et al., J. Membr. Sci., 329 (2009) 138-145. [5] Kafrouni et al., J. Membr. Sci. 329 (2009) 130–137. [6] Wang et al., Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 77 (2005) 167–174.

Topics