(750a) Polymers for Biomass Energy Conversion: Porous Scaffold Materials for a Continuous-Flow, Immobilized-Cell Fermentation Process | AIChE

(750a) Polymers for Biomass Energy Conversion: Porous Scaffold Materials for a Continuous-Flow, Immobilized-Cell Fermentation Process

Authors 

Hedden, R. C. - Presenter, Texas Tech University
Zhao, J. - Presenter, Texas Tech University


Due to limited global supplies of fossil fuel resources,
rising prices, and environmental problems, future energy needs must be met in
part or entirely by fuels derived from renewable resources.   Production of ethanol (EtOH) from non-food
feedstocks, namely cellulosic biomass, has received much attention.  If cellulosic EtOH is to become an
economically sustainable source of fuel in the future, drastic improvements to
process economics must be realized, however. 
Part of the cost reduction can be realized by lowering the cost of raw
materials and increasing the efficiency of conversion to EtOH, while other
reductions must be made in the areas of capital equipment and operating costs
by design of more efficient fermentation processes. 

Our work therefore focuses on design of an efficient
continuous-flow bioconversion process for production of EtOH, with emphasis on
cellulose-derived feedstocks, which may contain particulate material and
inhibiting compounds.  Sponge-like
polymeric materials having micrometer-scale porosity are a key element of a
new immobilized-cell, packed-bed fermentation process that already exhibits
volumetric productivity more than an
order of magnitude higher
than comparable batch fermentations.  Synthetic porous polymer scaffolds (SPPS)
are fabricated in the form of irregular particles of typical mesh size 1 to 2
mm, which are used to immobilize fermenting microorganisms as a packed bed
within a columnar reactor.  Design of
optimal (SPPS) for the immobilized cell reactor process is an emerging materials
challenge within the broad field of biomass energy conversion.

Optimal SPPS are inexpensive polymers or gels of relatively
low water content that contain pores and channels of typical diameter 1 to
30 micrometers and have a high pore volume fraction (0.4 to 0.8).  Pores should have extensive surface
connectivity, facilitating entry and exit of both reactants and fermenting micoorganisms.   Ethanologens
of typical size 1 to 10 micrometers are targeted, such as Escherichia coli, Zymomonas mobilis, or Saccharomyces cerevisiae,
and maximizing the cell density within the SPPS material is criticalTwo
general approaches to SPPS design are being pursued:

1) Preparation of a bicontinuous blend with one crosslinked
component and one extractable component, which is removed to generate randomly
structured, interconnected pores. 

2)  Crosslinking of a
matrix polymer around extractable polymer microfibers, which are removed to
leave well-defined cylindrical pores.  

In both cases, the extractable phase is removed prior to
fermentations by leaching in a solvent, preferably water, leaving pores or
channels in the SPPS with a high degree of connectivity to the surface.  SPPS materials are colonized naturally by
cells during the exponential growth phase in batch operation, after which continuous
reactor operation is initiated.   

Our work has so far examined conversion of glucose at an
inlet feed concentration of 1.0 to 5.0 % w/w by E. coli strain LY01.  A
continuous-flow column ICR packed with an SPPS material achieved volumetric
productivity 14 times higher than that of a comparable batch fermentation,
while the porous structure of the SPPS bed mediated problems with CO2
holdup.  SPPS materials are a great
improvement over traditional polymer gel materials such as calcium alginate,
carageenan, and polyacrylamide because the pores greatly reduce mass transfer
resistance and allow facile venting of CO2 bubbles during
fermentation.  In addition, packed beds
of SPPS particles allow small particulate solids to pass through the bed,
lowering the risk of clogging.  Our
presentation will discuss the advantages and limitations of the SPPS column
reactors, materials design issues, and progress in the conversion of sugars to
EtOH.

Topics