(233c) Model Catalyst Study of Pt Nanoparticles Supported On g-Al2O3 Single Crystal
AIChE Annual Meeting
2012
2012 AIChE Annual Meeting
Catalysis and Reaction Engineering Division
Novel Catalytic Imaging Techniques
Tuesday, October 30, 2012 - 9:30am to 9:50am
Model Catalyst Study of Pt Nanoparticles
Supported on g-Al2O3
Single Crystal
Zhongfan
Zhang,1 Long Li,2 Dong Su,3 Kim Kisslinger,3
Eric Stach,3 Judith C. Yang2
1Department of Mechanical Engineering and
Materials Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
2Department of Chemical and Petroleum
Engineering, Department of Physics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
15261, USA.
3Center for
Functional Nanomaterials, Brookhaven National
Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA.
Tremendous progress in
recent years in nanoparticle synthesis, nano-characterization
and materials computation has brought us tantalizingly close to predictive
catalyst design. However,
computational catalysis assume a specific heterogeneous catalyst system where
the nanoparticle shape, relative orientation to the single crystal support, defects,
and adsorbates are exceptionally well-defined,
whereas technologically-relevant heterogeneous catalyst materials are
polycrystalline and irregular, contain impurities and defects, and operate in a
complex environment may contain multiple gaseous species. To bridge the gap between theory and
experiment requires the comparison of model catalyst systems to theory. Recently, investigators have used single crystal oxide
supports to resolve the nanoparticle/support structure
and shape relations that can be directly compared to the theoretical
simulations and thus provide essential
insights into catalysis science [2]. Yet, a model Pt/g-Al2O3 system
has not been truly achieved due to challenges in producing single crystal g-Al2O3 thin film though Pt/g-Al2O3 is
arguably the most important technologically-relevant heterogeneous catalyst due
to its ubiquitous utilization in many critical energy and transportation
industries including oil refining, fuel cells, and catalytic converters. Surface
science studies have reported the formation of an ultra-thin gamma-like alumina
by oxidation of NiAl(110) [1,2], where
other studies revealed this structure to kappa alumina or Al10O13
[3,4]. Yang et. al and Doychak reported the
formation of metastable alumina during oxidation of (100)NiAl
in air in the temperature range of 800-950°C [5¨C7]. Here
we report the preparation of a model Pt/g-Al2O3 catalyst via oxidation of
NiAl(110)
followed by deposition of Pt nanoparticles and its
characterization by a cross-sectional high-resolution electron microscopy
(HREM) method.
The nanoparticle/support interactions, particularly the
role of their interface, play a key role in the 3-dimensional (3D) particle
shape, surface morphology and sintering behaviors of catalyst nanoparticles
which determine the heterogeneous catalysts' chemical properties. Experimental
measurements [8,9] and theoretical
simulations [10,11] were initiated to
quantitatively study the interfacial atomic and electronic structure and
adhesion energy between the NPs and their support. Our aim is to create a
single crystal g-Al2O3 thin
film in order to create a model system, characterize the structural and
electronic relations between the Pt and g-Al2O3 support, and compare our experimental results
with theoretical predictions.
The g-Al2O3(111) thin film was prepared via oxidization
of b-NiAl(110) at T=850°æ and dry air
for 1 hour, while the primary
orientation relation (O.R.) was determined to be NiAl(011)[110]||g-Al2O3(111)[211] and NiAl(011)[100]||g-Al2O3(111)[110] which is the
classical Nishiyama-Wasserman orientation
relationship. Pt nanoparticles were deposited onto g-Al2O3(111)
surface by electron-beam evaporation under ultrahigh vacuum. High-angle annular
dark-field (HAADF) imaging and HREM imaging (Figure.
2a and b) shows a significant fraction of the Pt NPs covering
the support with intimate contact to the g-Al2O3 support. The shape of the Pt
nanoparticles is a truncated octahedron which correlates with a dewetting shape. The dominant surface facets are the {111} and
{100} low- index planes which are the favorable facets for catalytic reactions [3].
The O.R. of the Pt NPs was found to be Pt(111)[211]||g-Al2O3(111)[211]
and Pt(100)[011]||g-Al2O3(111)[211],where the interface
planes Pt(110)|| g-Al2O3(110) followed the classical
lattice matching epitaxy. Considering
that the g-Al2O3 support
has a strong impact on the structural shape and electron density of the
catalytic NPs, as an extension of the Wulff
construction for 3D facets, Kaishew theorem, was used
to analyze the support effects on the Pt particle
shape, where the adhesion energy could be quantitatively obtained to interpret
the dewetting behavior and physical bonding of the Pt NPs. Electron
energy-loss spectrum (EELS) will performed for insights on the electronic structure
of Pt/g-Al2O3 interface that will
affect its catalytic performance. We gratefully acknowledge DOE-BES funding:
DE-FG02-03ER15476 and DE-AC02-98CH10886.
The structural characterizations were performed at the Center for
Functional Nanomaterials at Brookhaven National
Laboratory and the Nanofabrication and Characterization Facility at the University
of Pittsburgh.
References:
[1] JAEGER R, KUHLENBECK H, FREUND H,
WUTTIG M, HOFFMANN W, FRANCHY R, IBACH H. Surface science 1991;259:235-252.
[2] Freund H-J. Angewandte
chemie international edition in english
1997;36:452-475.
[3] Kresse G, Schmid M, Napetschnig E, Shishkin M, Köhler L, Varga P. Science (new york, n.y.) 2005;308:1440-2.
[4] Stierle A,
Renner F, Streitel R, Dosch
H, Drube W, Cowie BC.
Science (new york, n.y.)
2004;303:1652-6.
[5] Yang J, Schumann E, Levin I, Ruhle M. Acta materialia
1998;46:2195-2201.
[6] Grabke HJ. Intermetallics 1999;7:1153-1158.
[7] Grabke HJ.
Surface and interface analysis 2000;30:112-119.
[8] Tao FF, Salmeron
M. Science (new york, n.y.)
2011;331:171-4.
[9] Vayssilov
GN, Lykhach Y, Migani A, Staudt T, Petrova GP, Tsud N, Sk¨¢la T, Bruix A, Illas F, Prince KC, Matol¨ªn V, Neyman KM, Libuda J. Nature materials 2011;10:310-5.
[10] Frenken J, Stoltze P. Physical review letters 1999;82:3500-3503.
[11] P. M¨¹ller, Kern R. Surface science 2000;457:229-253.
See more of this Group/Topical: Catalysis and Reaction Engineering Division