(434e) Modeling and Analysis of Coupled NOx Storage and Reduction and Selective Catalytic Reduction Monolithic Catalysts

Modeling and Analysis of Coupled
NOx Storage and Reduction and Selective Catalytic Reduction Monolithic Catalysts

Bijesh
M. Shakya, Michael P. Harold[1],
and Vemuri Balakotaiah[2]

Department of Chemical & Biomolecular
Engineering

University of Houston
77204-4004

Abstract

The combination of NOx storage and
reduction (NSR) and selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalyst has emerged as
a promising technology for the reduction of NOx emission from the exhaust of
lean-burn or diesel engine vehicles. NSR is operated in periodic fuel-lean and
fuel-rich cycles in which NOx is stored on the storage component of the
catalyst, also called a lean NOx trap (LNT), during the lean-mode and is
reduced during the rich-mode. It is widely accepted that ammonia is formed as
an intermediate during the regeneration of stored NOx which further reacts to
form N₂. On the other hand, SCR technology uses transition metal
(Cu, Fe) exchanged zeolite catalyst and utilizes NH₃ generated from
external source to reduce the NOx from the lean exhaust. In the combined
NSR/SCR system, NH₃ generated in LNT during the rich phase is stored
in the SCR which is used to reduce the NOx during the subsequent lean phase. In
this way, the integrated system not only eliminates the need to have external
source of NH₃, as required in standalone SCR system, but also
provides an opportunity to lower the volume of expensive PGM based LNT catalyst,
both of which lower the overall cost of the aftertreatment system.

Many experimental and modeling
works have been done addressing various aspects of the combined system [1, 2].
Notwithstanding these recent developments, a detailed modeling study focusing
on the dual-layer LNT/SCR configuration is still lacking. In this study, we
developed a new global kinetic model for low Pt dispersion (8%) LNT and used it
in conjunction with previously developed kinetic model for Cu-Chabazite SCR
catalyst [3] to perform simulations of combined LNT/SCR catalyst [4].
Specifically, we analyzed the impact of washcoat loading of individual
component and effect of temperature in the dual-layer architecture. These
results were then compared with the brick configuration under identical operating
conditions and catalyst composition (i.e. same fraction of LNT and SCR). Fig 1
shows the model predicted cycle-averaged NOx conversion and N₂
selectivity as a function of SCR fraction in dual-layer and dual-brick LNT/SCR
catalyst at 230^oC and 300^oC. The simulation results show
that NOx conversion attains a maximum as the SCR loading is increased in
dual-layer catalysts. At higher SCR loading, the number of adsorption sites in
SCR is much larger than the amount of NH₃ that is generated in LNT
and as a result only a fraction of SCR layer close to LNT are utilized while
the rest act as an inert layer or a diffusional barrier thereby lowering the
conversion. Such a diffusional barrier is not significant for the case of brick
configuration at these temperatures (230^oC and 300^oC). Fig
1 also shows that maximum NOx conversion is obtained by dual-layer
configuration at both temperatures. This is due to the improved utilization of
in-situ generated NH₃ on the SCR layer which can be clearly seen by
the relatively higher selectivity of N₂ obtained in dual layer
catalyst compared to that of dual brick. However, at higher loading of SCR, NOx
conversion obtained by dual-layer catalyst is lower than that by dual brick for
the reasons mentioned above.

Fig 1 Simulated
NOx conversion and N₂ selectivity as a function of SCR loading
fraction for dual layer (LNT=30μm) and dual brick configuration at (a) 230^oC
and (b) 300^oC; Conditions: lean feed: 500 ppm NO+5% O₂ in
balance Ar for 60s; rich feed: 5000 ppm H₂ in balance Ar for 20s,
flow rate=1000 sccm (GHSV=60,000 hr^-1)   

            To
this end, we performed a detailed numerical analysis of coupled LNT/SCR system explaining
trends in terms of complex spatiotemporal coupling
occurring within the washcoat.

References:

1.     
D. Chatterjee, P. Kočí, V. Schmeißer, M.
Marek, et al., Catal Today, 151 (2010) 395

2.     
Y. Liu, M.P. Harold and D. Luss, Appl Catal B:
Environ, 121?122 (2012) 239

3.     
P.S. Metkar, M.P. Harold and V. Balakotaiah,
Chem Eng Sci, 87 (2013) 51

4.     
B.M. Shakya, M.P. Harold and V. Balakotaiah, in
preparation