(534d) Performance Analysis of Rdf Gasification in a Two Stage Fluid Bed - Plasma Process
AIChE Annual Meeting
2013
2013 AIChE Annual Meeting
Topical Conference: Innovations of Green Process Engineering for Sustainable Energy and Environment
Conversion of Solid Wastes to Energy and/Or Product II
Wednesday, November 6, 2013 - 4:15pm to 4:35pm
PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF RDF GASIFICATION IN
A TWO STAGE FLUID BED - PLASMA PROCESS
M. MATERAZZI* **, P. LETTIERI*, R. TAYLOR **, C. CHAPMAN **
* Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London, Torrington Place, London WC1E 7JE, UK
** Advanced Plasma Power, South Marston Business Park, Swindon, SN3 4DE, UK
Tar
generation and ash disposal represent the strongest barrier for use of single
stage fluid bed gasification for waste treatment, whereas sufficing for both is
only possible with expensive cleaning systems and further processing. Waste
fuels have, in general, physical and chemical characteristics much different
from fossil fuels, so that the behaviour of these two feedstock types in high
temperature fluid beds is very different one from the other. The high content
of ashes and inorganic materials in RDF (Refuse Derived Fuel) dictates the
thermal conditions in the fluid bed. A relatively low temperature has to be
used to prevent agglomeration and sintering of bed material. For this reason,
the gas that is produced by a standard fluid bed gasifier (FBG) has tars and
other condensable organic species that are technically difficult and costly to
remove. Furthermore, the bottom ash that is generated in the reactor may
contain high levels of carbon, heavy metals and organic pollutants which lower
the conversion efficiency of the process and limit any secondary usage.
The use
of plasma systems has increasingly been applied with thermal waste treatment
for its ability to completely decompose the input waste material into a
tar-free synthetic gas and an inert, environmentally stable, vitreous material
known as slag. The principal advantages that plasma offers to thermal
conversion processes, besides the already mentioned tar/ash related issues
absence, are a smaller installation size for a given waste throughput, and the
use of electricity as energy source, characteristics which permit the
technology to treat a wide range of low calorific value materials including
liquids and solids. In applying the plasma technology to the gaseous products
from a FBG, an advanced two-stage thermal process is able to achieve efficient
conversion of the chars and the complex organics to the primary syngas
constituents whilst limiting the electrical energy demand of the process
(Figure 1).
Figure
1: Schematic of Gasplasma two-stage thermal process.
This
study focused on the thermodynamic assets of using a two-stage (FBG + plasma)
thermal process over the conventional single-stage approach. These include,
for example, the fact that the primary thermal waste decomposition is performed
in conditions of optimal stoichiometric ratio for the gasification reactants.
Furthermore, staging the oxidant injection in two separate intakes
significantly improves the efficiency of the system, reducing the plasma power
consumption. The aim of the present work is also to determine the effects of
the thermal parameters so as to be able to select optimum gasification conditions
in a two stage process and to clarify the mechanism of thermal decomposition of
carbonaceous materials in the FBG and in the plasma converter.
A
flexible model capable of providing reliable quantitative predictions of
product yield and composition after the two-stage process has been developed.
The method has a systematic structure that embraces atom conservation
principles and equilibrium calculation routines, considering all the conversion
stages that lead from the initial waste feed to final products. The model was
also validated with experimental data from a demonstration plant in Swindon
(UK) (Table 1).
|
Case 1 |
Case 2 |
Case 3 |
Case 4 |
Case 5 |
Description: |
|
|
|
|
|
O2/fuel ratio (w/w) |
0.51 |
0.59 |
0.59 |
0.79 |
0.50 |
Bed temperature (°C) |
770 |
720 |
795 |
720 |
800 |
Proximate analysis, % (w/w) |
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed carbon |
6.4 |
12.2 |
11.6 |
8.5 |
22.8 |
Volatile matter |
59.6 |
50.2 |
64.8 |
47.6 |
68.0 |
Ash |
19.1 |
23.2 |
12.1 |
8.9 |
0.5 |
Moisture |
14.9 |
14.4 |
11.5 |
35.0 |
8.7 |
Ultimate analysis, % (w/w) |
|
|
|
|
|
C |
41.0 |
47.0 |
43.0 |
31.5 |
45.2 |
H |
5.7 |
6.3 |
5.6 |
4.1 |
6.46 |
O |
17.5 |
6.9 |
26.6 |
19.7 |
45.38 |
N |
1.2 |
1.74 |
0.61 |
0.4 |
0.26 |
S |
0.2 |
0.15 |
0.25 |
0.17 |
0.01 |
Cl |
0.4 |
0.31 |
0.34 |
0.23 |
0.25 |
GCV, MJ/kg (dry basis) |
22.1 |
26.4 |
21.0 |
21.0 |
22.0 |
Table
1: Experimental parameters and characteristics of solid wastes (as received).
The
study effectively demonstrated that the two-stage gasification system
significantly improves the gas yield of the system and the carbon conversion
efficiency, which are crucial in other single stage FBG systems, whilst
maintaining high energy performances.
The
most important outcome of this analysis is that the important parameters that
define the performance of the fluid bed-plasma process are the oxidants (oxygen
and/or steam) streams and the plasma power. These parameters are function of
the type of waste and the detailed aim of the project. Furthermore, the
two-stage performance can be quite accurately predicted by assumption of
thermodynamic equilibrium.
Figure
2: Comparison of model results with experiment data from the (left) FBG
gasifier; (right) FBG + Plasma converter
There
is close correlation between the observed and predicted values of the syngas
exiting the plasma converter, although the actual level of CO is still ~1%
below the theoretical value while the CO2 level is 1.5% higher. The
noted differences are likely due to flow and RDF composition uncertainties
rather than from the predictive model. Given the size and configuration of the
demonstration plant and the inherent variability of real RDF uncertainties are
to be expected. The layout of syngas heating value (LHV) and cold gas
efficiency (CGE) have been calculated and analyzed. It was found out that high
LHV and CGE values are maintained in different power and oxygen conditions. The
reason is that addition of plasma power into the converter decreases the amount
of secondary oxygen required for complete gasification and produces larger
amounts of CO and H2 in the product gas. The optimizing direction
for the two-stage process can only be determined after considering the detailed
situation on different projects.
Topics
Checkout
This paper has an Extended Abstract file available; you must purchase the conference proceedings to access it.
Do you already own this?
Log In for instructions on accessing this content.
Pricing
Individuals
AIChE Pro Members | $150.00 |
AIChE Graduate Student Members | Free |
AIChE Undergraduate Student Members | Free |
AIChE Explorer Members | $225.00 |
Non-Members | $225.00 |