(663a) Dynamic Data Reconciliation and Model Validation of a CO2 Capture Process Using Pilot Plant Data
AIChE Annual Meeting
2016
2016 AIChE Annual Meeting
Sustainable Engineering Forum
Separation Process Improvements for Sustainability
Thursday, November 17, 2016 - 8:30am to 8:52am
Rigorous thermodynamic and transport models with quantified uncertainties are first developed and validated using large number of experimental data. A novel approach is developed to obtain a rigorous mass transfer model by considering the wetted wall column and packed column data simultaneously while regressing the parameters of the interfacial area model, mass transfer coefficient models, and diffusivity models together. In addition, rigorous kinetic model, holdup model, and pressure drop model are developed. The steady-state model is validated using large number of data collected from NCCC.
One issue with the limited dynamic data that are available in the open literature is that they span a limited range of operating conditions and often only contain a single step change. In this work, the dynamic test runs were conducted by designing a test protocol that helps to reflect the process nonlinearity and ensures persistence of excitation approximately. The dynamic data include solvent composition and loading data that were manually collected every 5 minutes and analyzed in the NCCC laboratory. The dynamic data collected from the NCCC pilot plant were found to have significant measurement noise and some inaccurate measurements. In addition, there were a number of key variables that were unmeasured. To handle these issues, a dynamic data reconciliation (DDR) framework is developed to ensure closure of material and energy balances prior to model validation. As the rate-based models are not currently supported in Aspen Plus Dynamics, the software platform of our choice, an approximate method that matches the results from the rate-based Aspen Plus model closely is developed and implemented using scripts in Aspen Plus Dynamics. It is observed that the results from the dynamic model match very well with the experimental data that span more than three days. The dynamic model is then leveraged to perform a number of transient studies by simulating expected disturbances and setpoint tracking problems.