(398a) Investigation of CO2 Desorption Performance in Tri-Solvent Blends (MEA-AMP-PZ) with and without Catalyst
AIChE Annual Meeting
2017
2017 Annual Meeting
Liaison Functions
Poster Session: General Topics on Chemical Engineering I
Tuesday, October 31, 2017 - 3:15pm to 4:45pm
Investigation of CO2 desorption performance
in tri-solvent blends (MEA-AMP-PZ) with and without catalyst
Xiaowen Zhang a, Helei Liub*, and Zhiwu
Liang a,b*
a
Joint International Center for CO2 Capture and Storage (iCCS),
Provincial Hunan Key Laboratory for Cost-effective Utilization of Fossil Fuel
Aimed at Reducing CO2 Emissions, College of Chemistry and Chemical
Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, PR China
b
Clean Energy Technologies Research Institute (CETRI), Faculty of Engineering
and Applied Science, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan,
S4S 0A2, Canada
* Author for correspondence: Dr. Helei Liu:
lhl0925@hotmail.com & Dr. Zhiwu Liang Email: zwliang@hnu.edu.cn
Abstract
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is widely considered
as a predominant contributor of greenhouse gases. Thus, it is an urgent to
mitigate CO2 from atmosphere. Chemical
absorption technology using amine based solvent for capturing CO2 has
attracted the most attention because of its cost-effectiveness, maturity and absorption
large volumes of flue gas. However, a large quantity of energy is demanded during CO2
stripping which accounts for about 70-80% of the total cost of the CO2
capture system. The high energy penalty accompanying the high running cost is
the biggest barrier for post-combustion CO2 capture by using chemical
absorption.
Considerable research efforts have been devoted to reducing
the regeneration energy requirement. Recently, some researchers have reported
that the development of amines tri-solvent blends for CO2 capture is
an effective method. Because it could not only dramatically utilize the potentials
of the individual amine, but also address their individual problems. Nwaoha et
al.1 studied the tri-solvent blend with two absorption rate promoters (i.e.
piperazine (PZ) and monoethanolamine (MEA)) and a hindered amine 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol
(AMP). The results indicated that the tri-solvent blends amines had faster desorption
rate and lower regeneration heat duty in comparison with the commercial amine
MEA. Based on their work, the tri-solvent blends amines could be considered as
one of potential novel absorbents for CO2 capture in post-combustion
processes. However, the heat duty of tri-solvent blends amines is still high. Idem et al. proposed that the addition of solid acid catalysts such
as H-ZSM-5 into rich amine solution for CO2
stripping is an efficient method to decrease the heat duty2. However, the study of regeneration behavior of the amine tri-solvent
blends with the catalysts is not available. Hence, the investigation on the tri-solvent blends amines with
catalyst is interesting to present in order to further reduce of solvent
regeneration energy requirement. In the present study, the test of MEA-AMP-PZ tri-solvent
blends with four different acid catalysts (e.g. HZSM-5, gamma-Al2O3,
SAPO-34, and SO42-/TiO2) and without catalyst were investigated in
a batch reactor for understand the process of regeneration.
In this work, the experiments regeneration was studied
by using a batch reactor, which was displayed
in Figure 1. 2 L rich amine solutions with the desired CO2 loading
were introduced into a 3 L four-necked flask, which was immersed in the oil
bath (DF-101T). The rich CO2 loading of all amines was set at their
equilibrium CO2 loading at absorption conditions of 313 K and 15.1% CO2
partial pressure1,2. 25 g catalyst were put
into the amine solution. The time was not recorded until the amine solvent
temperature reached at 338 K. The CO2 loadings of solution at
time of at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, and 9 h were measured by using a Chittick
apparatus3. The heat duty for the CO2 desorption was measured by an
electric energy meter.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the batch reactor for CO2
desorption process
The heat duty (H, kJ/mol) is could be obtained
by equation (1) .
The relative heat duty (RH, %) was used in this work. The
heat duty of 5M MEA without catalyst regeneration in first 2 h is considered as
Hbaseline(kJ/mol). The heat duty of new systems regeneration in
first 2 h was considered as Hi (kJ/mol). RH was calculated as the
following equation (2).
The typical CO2 desorption profile of the
four amine systems (e.g. 5M MEA, 3M MEA-2.5M AMP-0.5M PZ, 3M MEA-2M AMP-1M PZ and 3M MEA-1.5M
AMP-1.5M PZ) at the regeneration temperature of 369 K is shown in Figure 2. It is clear that all the studied
tri-solvent blends show a faster desorption rate in comparison with the 5M MEA.
The 3M MEA-2.5M AMP-0.5M PZ system shows the fastest CO2
desorption rate. As shown in Figure 2, the CO2 loading decreased dramatically
in the first 2 h. In this work, the heat duty was calculated by considering the
first 2 h of the regeneration process.
Figure 2. CO2 desorption in single and
tri-solvent blends amines without catalyst at 369 K.
Figure 3 depicts the relative energy requirement of
amine solvent regeneration. It is noted that all the studied tri-solvent blends
show much lower regeneration heat duty than 5M MEA. The 3M MEA-2.5M
AMP-0.5M PZ with AMP/PZ molar
ratio of 5 requires the lowest regeneration heat duty. It could be found that
the heat duty decreased with the increase of concentration of the AMP. Based on
this result, the system of 3M MEA-2.5M
AMP-0.5M PZ could be considered as the best blend solvent in term of CO2
desorption performance.
Figure 3. Relative heat duty for MEA-AMP-PZ
tri-solvent blends and 5M MEA without catalyst at 369 K.
To further accelerate the CO2 desorption
rate and reduce the heat duty, the regeneration behavior of 3M MEA-2.5M
AMP-0.5M PZ system studied by adding four different catalysts (e.g. H-ZSM-5, gamma-Al2O3, SAPO-34, and SO42-/TiO2).
The performance of CO2 desorption curves of this system with and
without catalyst are shown in Figure 4. It can be seen that the lean loading
value of different systems declined to be the same, which means that the
catalyst can only change the reaction rate but will not alter the chemical
equilibrium. However, the addition of four acid catalysts play an positive
effect on CO2 desorption rate. The result proved that the catalyst
can only accelerate the reaction rate without the effect on the chemical
equilibrium. Figure 5 displays
the relative regeneration heat duty of different amine-catalyst systems. The CO2 desorption performance in
terms of the relative heat duty for different catalysts could be ranked as: H-ZSM-5 (38.4%) > gamma-Al2O3(40.1%)
> SAPO-34 (41.0%) > SO42-/TiO2 (42.8%) > the blank (48.1%). The result indicated
that four catalysts further accelerated the CO2 desorption rate and reduced
the heat duty in comparison with the blank test, and H-ZSM-5 showed the best
catalytic performance of CO2 desorption. The addition of acid
catalyst into the rich loading amine solution results in increasing proton concentration,
which could react with the carbamate
(i.e. Amine-COO-). Thereby, the improvement of CO2
desorption rate and the decrease of the heat duty were observed.
Figure 4. CO2 desorption in 3M MEA-2.5M AMP-0.5M PZ with and
without catalyst at 369 K.
Figure 5. Relative heat duty for 3M MEA-2.5M AMP-0.5M
PZ with and without catalyst at 369 K.
Acknowledgment: The financial support from the National
Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21476064, 21376067 and U1362112), National
Key Technology R&D Program (Nos. 2012BAC26B01 and 2014BAC18B04), Innovative
Research Team Development Plan-Ministry of Education of China (No. IRT1238), and
China's State 'Project 985' in Hunan University-Novel Technology Research and
Development for CO2 Capture as well as Hunan University to the Joint
International Center for CO2 Capture and Storage (iCCS) are gratefully
acknowledged.
References
Checkout
This paper has an Extended Abstract file available; you must purchase the conference proceedings to access it.
Do you already own this?
Log In for instructions on accessing this content.
Pricing
Individuals
AIChE Pro Members | $150.00 |
AIChE Graduate Student Members | Free |
AIChE Undergraduate Student Members | Free |
AIChE Explorer Members | $225.00 |
Non-Members | $225.00 |