(412c) Improvement of Oxy-Combustion Using Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analysis
AIChE Annual Meeting
2017
2017 Annual Meeting
Environmental Division
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies and Their Use
Tuesday, October 31, 2017 - 3:53pm to 4:12pm
Improving the efficiency of oxy-combustion by reducing the parasitic energy consumption of both ASU and GPU is a requirement for this technology to be more competitive in the market. This can be achieved by increasing the separation efficiency of the ASU and GPU. Another way of reducing losses in oxy-combustion is to improve the thermal efficiency of the plant, by increasing the operating conditions to the boiler. However, this would require the use of newer materials, increasing capital expenditure (CAPEX) and make it a riskier project.
Heat integration using low grade heat of compression from the ASU and GPU to pre-heat feedwater is another way of increasing efficiency. This strategy possesses the advantage of using the available resources more efficiently while reducing the number of unit operations, thus reducing CAPEX, and allowing more steam to be used for electricity generation. Acceptance of a technology is highly dependent on the levelised cost of electricity (LCOE) which is influenced by CAPEX and fuel price. This demonstrates that there must be an increase of process efficiency while keeping CAPEX reduced for technological innovation to occur.
An oxy-combustion comprised of a double column cryogenic ASU, an ultra-supercritical boiler with flue gas treatment, and a cryogenic distillation GPU was simulated using Aspen HYSYS. The model developed showed a good agreement with data from IECM program and the values reported by Callide oxyfuel project, with the exception for O2 and fuel consumption. This difference was found due to the assumption of complete combustion, with no carbon monoxide formation and no heat losses to the environment.
The minimum thermodynamic separation work was calculated for both ASU and GPU and was combined with the theoretical Carnot efficiency to determine the maximum efficiency that an oxy-combustion could achieve. An exergy destruction analysis was performed on each unit operation to quantify the inefficiencies within the process, which would allow for a rational improvement of the process.
In conclusion, the process was improved based on inefficiency minimisation, and then a techno-economic analysis was performed to determine its economic viability. This allowed for an efficiency improvement of 1.4 % (gross) and 3 % (net) as well as a 15 % reduction of CAPEX while decreasing the parasitic power consumption of the ASU from 204 to 197 kWh/tO2 and the GPU from 140 to 137 kWh/tCO2. Both reduction of CAPEX and power consumption leads to a decrease of the levelised cost of electricity (LCOE).