(200ah) Effect of Solvent in Strip Film Manufacturing Containing BCS CLASS II Drugs VIA Solution Casting
AIChE Annual Meeting
2018
2018 AIChE Annual Meeting
Pharmaceutical Discovery, Development and Manufacturing Forum
Poster Session: Pharmaceutical
Monday, October 29, 2018 - 3:30pm to 5:00pm
Solution casting was found to have many manufacturing problems starting from polymer solution preparation to drying. Each solvent had a unique impact on the viscosity of the polymer solution. As a result, each solvent formulation required different casting conditions to produce a final product with a consistent thickness. Additionally, the maximum drug loading was limited by the solubility of the solvent. Therefore, at drug loadings above the solubility limit for ethanol and methanol films, a slurry was obtained. Interestingly, phase separation occurred in the precursor made with acetone at high drug loadings (60% FNB in dry film).
All the solvents led to different particle shapes and crystallinity in the dry film. At a drug loading of 10% FNB in the dry film the films made with acetone were the strongest, while methanol led to the weakest films When the drug loading was decreased to 2.5% in the dry film, tensile strength of the films made with acetone were decreased while it was observed to increase for ethanol and methanol films. Although all the solution casted films had different properties, similar dissolution rates were obtained, which were improved compared to films loaded with as-received drug particles. Improved dissolution was attributed to presence of amorphous form of drug, although as expected, significant recrystallization was observed, which continued with time. All the solution casted films also had good drug content uniformity for 10% FNB loading in the film (RSD% < 6), despite re-crystallization of the drug. These results suggest that, although solution casting seems to offer some benefits when creating a dosage form for poorly water soluble drugs, the requirement for careful formulation selection (solvent and polymer type) and unpredictable recrystallization, shows that slurry casting [4-6] is a better candidate for practical implementation.
REFERENCES
- Dixit, R.P. and S.P. Puthli, Oral strip technology: overview and future potential. J Control Release, 2009. 139(2): p. 94-107.
- Palem, C.R., N.R. Dudhipala, S.K. Battu, M.A. Repka, and M. Rao Yamsani, Development, optimization and in vivo characterization of domperidone-controlled release hot-melt-extruded films for buccal delivery. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 2016. 42(3): p. 473-84.
- Garsuch, V. and J. Breitkreutz, Comparative investigations on different polymers for the preparation of fastâdissolving oral films. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 2010. 62(4): p. 539-545.
- Sievens-Figueroa, L., A. Bhakay, J.I. Jerez-Rozo, N. Pandya, R.J. Romanach, B. Michniak-Kohn, Z. Iqbal, E. Bilgili, and R.N. Dave, Preparation and characterization of hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose films containing stable BCS Class II drug nanoparticles for pharmaceutical applications. Int J Pharm, 2012. 423(2): p. 496-508.
- Krull, S.M., R. Susarla, A. Afolabi, M. Li, Y. Ying, Z. Iqbal, E. Bilgili, and R.N. Dave, Polymer strip films as a robust, surfactant-free platform for delivery of BCS Class II drug nanoparticles. Int J Pharm, 2015. 489(1-2): p. 45-57.
- Zhang, L., Y. Li, M. Abed, and R.N. Dave, Incorporation of surface-modified dry micronized poorly water-soluble drug powders into polymer strip films. Int J Pharm, 2018. 535(1-2): p. 462-472.