(265a) Sensitivity of Surface Structures Towards Hydrodeoxygenation of Propanoic Acid over Palladium Catalysts
AIChE Annual Meeting
2019
2019 AIChE Annual Meeting
Catalysis and Reaction Engineering Division
Fundamentals of Catalysis III: Hydrogenation and Dehydrogenation
Tuesday, November 12, 2019 - 8:00am to 8:18am
Two reaction mechanisms - decarbonylation (DCN) and decarboxylation (DCX) have been investigated for the HDO of long-chain carboxylic acid representatives such as propanoic acid. As each metal surface architecture shows distinct d-band congestion and center location (Catalysis Letters 1997, 46, 31-35) with respect to the Fermi level, they exhibit different chemisorption energies and binding modes of adsorbates. In our study, the effect of surface structures on the HDO of propanoic acid has been investigated by density functional theory (DFT) and microkinetic models with comprehensive linear lateral interaction calculations over Pd(100) and Pd(111) surface models at an experimental reaction conditions of 473K. DFT data and Bronsted-Evans-Polanyi (BEP) relationship demonstrated high activity of C-H and O-H bond dissociations on Pd(100) and Pd(111), respectively. Our mechanistic study suggests that decarbonylation of propanoic acid on Pd(100) and Pd(111) via dehydrogenation of α and β âcarbons followed by C-OH and C-C bond dissociation is favorable. Although energetics favored DCN over DCX under gas phase reaction conditions, it is still difficult to identify a preferred mechanism without developing a mean-field microkinetic model under realistic reaction conditions. Thus, a mean-field microkinetic model was established based on first-principles data and the steady-state species balances of various adsorbed species.
A coverage dependent microkinetic model results an overall turnover frequency about six order of magnitude higher on Pd(100) relative to Pd(111). Dominance of decarbonylation over decarboxylation has been determined by microkinetic model on Pd(100), however, on Pd(111), decarbonylation and decarboxylation are equally competitive. Moreover, our kinetically preferred reaction pathways have been found similar with our mechanistic study. A sensitivity analysis suggested that the C-OH bond cleavage is controlling the overall reaction rate over the Pd(100) and Pd(111) catalyst surfaces. Furthermore, C-CO2 bond dissociation to CH3CH2 and CO2 was also found to be a crucial step and is partially rate controlling in the decarboxylation mechanism on Pd(111). Overall, our results imply that the HDO of propanoic acid over Pd catalysts is sensitive to surface structure and Pd(100) is comparatively more active.