(441e) Fast Pyrolysis of Pine Biomass in a Gas Solid Vortex Reactor
AIChE Annual Meeting
2019
2019 AIChE Annual Meeting
Process Development Division
Advances in Process Intensification
Wednesday, November 13, 2019 - 9:45am to 10:05am
Nowadays, the fluidized bed reactor (FBR) is one of the preferred technologies for fast pyrolysis due to its ease in design and operation. However, FBRs suffer from operational limits, eg. the maximum fluidization gas flow, while mass and heat transfer rates are moderate. These limits are observed to decrease in a fluidized bed operating in a centrifugal field. The Gas-Solid Vortex Reactor (GSVR) sustains a rotating solids bed by continuous tangential injection of fluidizing gas through multiple small injection slots. GSVRs are known to offer advantages over conventional fluidized bed reactors in the gravitational field, eg. the bed is more densely packed and gas-solid slip velocities are significantly higher. The latter results in enhanced heat and mass transfer rates.
At the Laboratory for Chemical Technology (LCT, Ghent University), biomass fast pyrolysis is carried out in a GSVR demonstration unit [7]. The goal is to further optimize the bio-oil yield and to determine the bio-oil molecular composition using advanced analytical techniques (GCxGC). The present work focuses on experimentally exploring the bio-oil yield in the GSVR demonstration unit. Additionally, CFD simulations including reaction kinetics of this experimental GSVR are performed [8]. By comparing numerical and experimental results, the performance of the selected kinetic model will be validated. First the elemental and molecular composition of the feedstock, and the biomass particle aspect ratio are closely examined. Fast pyrolysis experiments with pine are performed to determine the yield of the main pyrolysis fractions (i.e., bio-oil, char and non-condensable gases). GSVR is compared with conventional FBRs in terms of their respective pyrolysis product fraction distribution. Next, after each experiment, the elemental and molecular composition of the bio-oil obtained from the GSVR is compared with that of bio-oil from FBR technology.
References
[1] Mohan, D., et al. (2006). "Pyrolysis of Wood/Biomass for Bio-oil: A Critical Review." Energy & Fuels 20(3): 848-889.
[2] Czernik, S. and A. V. Bridgwater (2004). "Overview of Applications of Biomass Fast Pyrolysis Oil." Energy & Fuels 18(2): 590-598.
[3] D. Shen, W. Jin, J. Hu, R. Xiao, K. Luo (2015). An overview on fast pyrolysis of the main constituents in lignocellulosic biomass to valued-added chemicals: Structures, pathways and interactions, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 51 761-774.
[4] M.S. Mettler, D.G. Vlachos, P.J. Dauenhauer (2012). Top ten fundamental challenges of biomass pyrolysis for biofuels, Energy Environ. Sci, 5 7797-7809.
[5] Bridgwater, A. V. (2012). "Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading." Biomass and Bioenergy 38: 68-94.
[6] Ranzi, E., et al. (2008). "Chemical Kinetics of Biomass Pyrolysis." Energy & Fuels 22(6): 4292-4300
[7] González Quiroga, Arturo, Pieter Reyniers, Shekhar Kulkarni, Maria del Mar Torregrosa Galindo, Patrice Perreault, Geraldine Heynderickx, Kevin Van Geem, and Guy Marin. (2017). âDesign and Cold Flow Testing of a Gas-Solid Vortex Reactor Demonstration Unit for Biomass Fast Pyrolysis.â Chemical Engineering Journal 329: 198â210.
[8] Kulkarni, S., Vandewalle, L., González Quiroga, A., Perreault, P., Heynderickx, G., Van Geem, K., & Marin, G. (2018). Computational fluid dynamics-assisted process intensification study for biomass fast pyrolysis in a gasâsolid vortex reactor. ENERGY & FUELS, 32(10), 10169â10183.