The β-(Al
xGa
1-x)
2O
3/Ga
2O
3 heterostructure is attracting attention for field-effect transistors (HFETs) that have shown impressive and improving performance. The formation of a two-dimensional electron gas enhances the transport properties, with advantages in device performance. These heterostructures extend the range of options for Ga
2O
3 based electronics, which is a welcome addition to potential ultra-wide bandgap semiconductors with power figure-of-merits well beyond SiC and GaN. The absence of p-type doping for Ga
2O
3 and its alloys means only majority carrier devices are possible and the availability of (Al
xGa
1-x)
2O
3/Ga
2O
3 heterostructures for scaled field effect transistors is important if radiofrequency applications are to be addressed by Ga
2O
3. The options for gate dielectric are limited in the case of (Al
xGa
1-x)
2O
3 (referred to here in short as AGO), which exhibits a bandgap of around 5 eV and must utilize dielectric material with a bandgap of 7 eV of higher to have adequate offsets in both the conduction and valence bands. Additionally, the gate dielectric must also be able to be deposited without disrupting the oxide surface. The two most common gate dielectrics in general for Ga
2O
3 and specifically for β-(Al
xGa
1-x)
2O
3/Ga
2O
3 have been Al
2O
3 and SiO
2. Both of these dielectrics are thermodynamically stable on the AGO. Recent studies have shown the surface of β-Ga
2O
3 is easily degraded by exposure to plasma environments involving energetic ion bombardment. An advantage of sputtering is that it is broadly available and can produce pure oxides, but sputtered oxides can have plasma-induced damage.
In this paper we show that there are differences of up to 1 eV in band alignments for the common gate dielectrics SiO2 and Al2O3 on single crystal (Al0.14Ga0.86)2O3, depending on whether they are deposited by sputtering or Atomic Layer Deposition. In the case of Al2O3, this changed the band alignment from nested (type I) to staggered gap (type II). The valence band offset at eachheterointerface was measured using X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy and was determined to be -0.85 eV for sputtered Al2O3 and 0.23 eV for ALD Al2O3 on β-(Al0.14Ga0.86)2O3, while for SiO2 it was 0.6 eV for sputtered and 1.6 eV for ALD. These results are consistent with recent results showing that the surface of Ga2O3 and related alloys are susceptible to severe changes during exposure to energetic ion environments.