(741d) Elucidating the Effects of ReOx Promoters and Water during Metal-Catalyzed C–O Hydrogenolysis of Alcohols | AIChE

(741d) Elucidating the Effects of ReOx Promoters and Water during Metal-Catalyzed C–O Hydrogenolysis of Alcohols

Authors 

Nystrom, S. V. Jr. - Presenter, University of Florida
Godara, M., University of Florida
Hibbitts, D., University of Florida
Chen, C., University of Florida
The selective C–O cleavage of biomass-derived alcohols is critical to their transformation into value-added chemicals (while complete deoxygenation is desired for fuels). Oxophilic metal promotors such as ReOx, WOx, MoOx, RuOx, have been shown to increase C–O hydrogenolysis rates and alter product distributions for a variety of hydrogenolysis reactions.1–4 Most studies have focused on aqueous phase reactions, which complicate kinetic studies and mechanistic analysis because of the ubiquitous role of H2O in chemical reactions (as a solvent, reactant, and co-catalyst). Here, we have examined the effects of ReOx-promotors on Pt and Au catalysts for C–O hydrogenolysis of glycerol (a bio-diesel byproduct) and ethanol (a volatile fermentation product suitable for gas and liquid phase comparisons). These reactions are studied in aqueous and gas-phase flow and batch reactors with and without co-fed water.

Pt (5 wt. %) and Pt-ReOx (5 wt. % of both metals) were impregnated on activated carbon (Norit SG-1), additionally, Au (1 wt. %) and Au-ReOx (1 wt. %, 3 wt. %) were prepared on CeO2 supports. Aqueous phase reactions are carried out in a batch reactor (1 wt. % alcohol, 200 °C, 40 bar H2). For glycerol reactions on Pt-based systems, the ReOx promoter increased rates by a factor of ~10 (normalized by Pt-surface atoms) and shifted selectivity from 1,2-propanediol (72%) and ethylene glycol (19%) to 1,3-propanediol (18%), 1,2-propanediol (20 %), and 1- and 2-propanol (61 %). These selectivity and rate shifts indicate that ReOx facilitates C–O activation and enables C–O activation at secondary positions of the C3 backbone. This result is consistent with prior studies2,4 and consistent with their work suggesting that ReOx promotors incorporate Brønsted acid sites into the catalyst. These Brønsted acid sites catalyze dehydration reactions (with a preference towards secondary C–O activation because of enhanced carbenium ion stability) and any unsaturated compounds formed via dehydration are rapidly converted to saturated alcohols on Pt at these high H2 pressures (40 bar). For ethanol, ReOx increases Pt-based reaction rates by ~3 and shifts selectivity away from diethylether (formed by condensation) and towards gas-phase ethane formation. Preliminary data gathered in a gas-phase flow reactor (neat ethanol feed, no water) shows rates ~10-times higher on ReOx-Pt than the unpromoted Pt catalyst and (as was observed in aqueous phase) shifts selectivity away from diethylether and towards C–O cleavage products. This indicates that liquid H2O is not required to enable ReOx to promote C–O hydrogenolysis rates, additional studies which will co-feed water and ethanol vapor will further elucidate the role of H2O in this reaction.

Au-based catalysts, in contrast to Pt, are ineffective at hydrogenation; thus, dehydration chemistry on Brønsted acid sites (formed by ReOx) should yield unsaturated compounds and avoid complete deoxygenation (as C3 dienes are very unstable). Such hypotheses were confirmed here, with glycerol showing no reactivity on mono-functional Au/CeO2 catalysts while Au-ReOx/CeO2 produced prop-2-en-1-ol at high (> 90%) selectivity, indicating that C–O cleavage can occur solely on bifunctional Au-ReOx sites (ReOx alone is not reactive) and that it forms, as primary intermediates, unsaturated compounds (indicative of Brønsted acid reactivity). The consequence of phase and the presence of H2O on these Au-catalyzed reactions is currently being examined.

References

(1) Nakagawa, Y.; Tamura, M.; Tomishige, K. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2018, 44, 3879–3903.

(2) Daniel, O. M.; DeLaRiva, A.; Kunkes, E. L.; Datye, A. K.; Dumesic, J. A.; Davis, R. J. ChemCatChem 2010, 2, 1107–1114.

(3) Hibbitts, D.; Tan, Q.; Neurock, M. J. Catal. 2014, 315, 48–58.

(4) Chia, M.; Pagán-Torres, Y. J.; Hibbitts, D.; Tan, Q.; Pham, H. N.; Datye, A. K.; Neurock, M.; Davis, R. J.; Dumesic, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 12675–12689.