(677c) Wet Metal-Support Interfaces Control Paths of H2 and O2 Activation over Au Nanoparticles | AIChE

(677c) Wet Metal-Support Interfaces Control Paths of H2 and O2 Activation over Au Nanoparticles

Authors 

Adams, J. S. - Presenter, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Ricciardulli, T., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Vijayaraghavan, S., University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Sampath, A., University of Illinois
Flaherty, D., University of Illinois At Urbana-Champaign
Chen, H., University of Illinois Urbana Champaign
Au-based catalysts readily oxidize and reduce small molecules (e.g., CO, H2, O2) and organic substrates at metal-support interfaces, often with the assistance of water molecules. Herein, we investigate how the support identity and size of Au nanoparticles affect transformations of H–H, O–O, and O–H bonds during reactions of H2 and O2 at the solid-liquid-support interfaces of Au-based catalysts.

Figure 1a shows that rates of H2 activation are 1-2 orders of magnitude greater on Au nanoparticles supported on metal oxides (e.g., TiO2) compared to more inert materials like carbon and BN, suggesting oxygen functions (e.g., O-H) assist H–H activation. Similarly, basic and reducible metal oxides (e.g., Au-La2O3) favor O–O bond cleavage (16-22 kJ mol-1), while more inert and acidic interfaces (e.g., Au-SiO2) obstruct O–O dissociation (72-85 kJ mol-1) and improve selectivity to H2O2. Moreover, H2O2 selectivities increase as the fraction of sites at the Au-support interface decrease relative to metallic sites far from this interface, improving H2O2 selectivity on larger Au nanoparticles (2-25 nm).

Figure 1b shows that rates of H2O2 formation increase linearly with H2 pressure and are independent of O2 pressure on Au-TiO2, suggesting O2-derived species saturate active sites. Moreover, rates of HD scrambling are one order of magnitude lower than rates of H2O2 formation, indicating irreversible adsorption and activation of H2 and D2. Such findings agree with decreased oxygen reduction rates when using D2 instead of H2 (kH/kD = 1.5), implicating kinetically relevant H–H dissociation during H2O2 formation. Still, Figure 1c shows that H2O2 only forms within protic solvents, indicating H2O2 forms by proton transfer steps. Yet, rates are equal within H2O and D2O, implying proton transfer is kinetically irrelevant. These findings suggest that solid-liquid-support interfaces catalyze proton-electron transfer reactions of H2, O2, and H2O, limited by H–H activation steps.