(6d) Solubility of Light Gases in Water and NaCl Brines at High Pressures
AIChE Annual Meeting
2023
2023 AIChE Annual Meeting
Engineering Sciences and Fundamentals
High Pressure Phase Equilibria and Modeling
Monday, November 6, 2023 - 9:00am to 9:20am
The measurements were conducted by a static synthetic method [1] using a high-pressure view cell. The view cell was closed at one end and had a sapphire window at the other end which allowed visual observation of the transition from gas-liquid two-phase to single liquid-phase. Fig. 1 [1] is a schematic diagram of the measurement system. The camera opposite to the window was used to capture live video inside the cell. The stirrer bar was located near the closed end of the view cell. The water or brine that was stored in the bottle was injected and pressurized by the syringe pump.
Initially, the view cell was filled with a known amount of gas, after which water or brine was injected under stirring until all the gas dissolved. At this point, the equilibrium temperature and pressure were recorded. The amount of gas was obtained from the gas-filling pressure, and the volume and temperature of the cell at the gas filling condition, while the amount of water or brine was obtained by the displacement of the injection pump.
A crucial feature of this design was that it prevented gas from being trapped in any dead volume in the cell without contact with liquid. Although there was some unavoidable dead volume around the sapphire window, the view cell was vertically positioned during the experiment, which guaranteed that the pre-filled gas was compressed towards the closed end of the cell as the liquid advanced. In this way, the gas that was compressed between the closed end and the liquid had nowhere to go other than dissolution into the liquid. This design also minimized the leakage possibility of gas. Another key feature of the apparatus was the use of materials that are resistant to corrosion in concentrated brines: titanium alloy, sapphire and perfluoro-elastomer.
The bubble pressures were determined by a combination of graphical analysis of pressure-volume data, a physical model and visual observation. The relative uncertainty of the bubble pressure of dissolved gas at a given temperature and salt molality was estimated to be 4%. The new results from this study were used to develop a simple model to predict H2, CO and N2 solubility in water and NaCl brines as a function of temperature, pressure and salt molality up to 4 mol/kg. This model is an extended Krichevsky-Kasarnovsky (KK) equation [2] given by:
ln(f2 / b2) = ln(k12) + ksbs + (v2 / RT)(p-p1,sat). (1)
Here, f2 is the fugacity of gaseous solute in the gas phase, b2 is the molality of the solute in the aqueous phase, k12 is Henryâs constant, ks is the Sechenov coefficient, bs is the molality of salt, v2 is the partial molar volume of the solute in aqueous solution, p is pressure and p1,sat is the solvent vapour pressure. Three parameters were regressed for each isotherm: k12, v2 and ks.
Fig. 2 (a) shows the experimental results for CO solubility in water and NaCl(aq) solutions, in comparison with both the KK model and literature data, while Fig. 2 (b) shows the Henryâs constant k12, and Sechenov coefficient ks as a function of temperature for CO solubility in water and NaCl(aq) solutions.
The new gas solubility data in concentrated brines from this study extend the available data to a higher pressure up to about 40 MPa, which is of relevance to the geological carbon storage and underground hydrogen storage conditions. To the best of our knowledge, this study provides the first data for CO solubility in brine with high molality of salt. The extended KK model developed by this work can be used to predict H2, CO and N2 solubility in water and NaCl brines at elevated temperatures and pressures and at salt molalities of up to 4 mol/kg. The solubility data of H2, CO and N2 are important for the design of a GCS project and UHS project.
Reference
[1] G.A. Torín-Ollarves, J.P.M. Trusler, Fluid Phase Equilibria, 539 (2021) 113025.
[2] I.R. Krichevsky, J.S. Kasarnovsky, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 57 (1935) 2168-2171.
[3] C. Gillespie, G.M. Wilson, Research report, United States, (1980) pages: 38.
[4] K. Fischer, M. Petri, J. Chen, O. Noll, J. Gmehling, Unpublished data (1995).
[5] J. Jung, O. Knacke, D. Neuschütz, Chemie Ingenieur Technik - CIT, 43 (1971) 112-116.
[6] R. Rettich, R. Battino, E. Wilhelm, Berichte der Bunsengesellschaft für physikalische Chemie, 86 (1982) 1128-1132.
[7] W. Winkler, Berichte der Deutschen Chemischen Gesellschaft, 24 (1891) 89-101.
[8] G.G. Power, H. Stegall, Journal of Applied Physiology, 29 (1970) 145-149.
[9] E. Douglas, Journal of Physical Chemistry, 71 (1967) 1931-1933.