(80f) A Framework for the Combined Evaluation of Economic and CO2 Fixation Feasibility of Carbon Capture and Utilization (CCU) Reaction Pathways | AIChE

(80f) A Framework for the Combined Evaluation of Economic and CO2 Fixation Feasibility of Carbon Capture and Utilization (CCU) Reaction Pathways

Authors 

Ibrahim, G. - Presenter, Washington State University
Challiwala, M. S., Texas A&M University
El-Halwagi, M., Texas A&M University
Elbashir, N., Texas A&M University at Qatar
A global effort is underway to reduce GHG emissions to address the growing concerns of anthropogenic climate change. At 8.5 GtCO2 in 2020, industrial greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions account for approximately 24% of total global anthropogenic emissions. Therefore, the industrial sector needs to reduce GHG emissions by 1.2% to 7.4 GtCO2 by 2030 to meet sustainability and decarbonization targets. Carbon dioxide capture and utilization (CCU) has garnered significant attention as a means of reducing GHG emissions and for decarbonizing several industries, including the natural gas industry, the cement industry, and the steel manufacturing industry. One means of applying CCU to a process is through the chemical conversion of CO2 ­­into other products. Not all CCU processes may be economically feasible or environmentally sustainable in terms of CO2 fixation. Typically, to assess the CO2 fixation of a given CCU reaction, a life cycle assessment (LCA) is conducted. Additionally, a technoeconomic assessment (TEA) is carried out to evaluate the economic viability of the process. It should be noted that conducting these assessments requires significant effort and time, as well as a substantial amount of theoretical and empirical data. Therefore, it is recommended to perform these assessments at a later stage in the development and scale-up of a CCU technology.

In this work we develop a framework for the combined evaluation of economic and CO2 fixation feasibility of CCU reaction pathways at early stages of the technology’s development by integrating two metrics: the metric for inspecting sales and reactants (MISR) and the CO2Fix. The MISR is a metric used to assess the economic feasibility of any commercial reaction. The CO2Fix estimates the CO2 fixation capacity for a given CCU reaction, accounting for Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions, while providing an upper limit for CO2 fixation. Both metrics use limited information obtained from the reaction stoichiometry and basic thermodynamic properties of the materials involved in the reaction. The framework categorizes a given CCU conversion technology into one of 4 types: Type 1 technologies that are both economically feasible (MISR>1) and lead to CO2 fixation (CO2Fix>1), Type 2 technologies that lead to CO2 fixation (CO2Fix>1) but are not economically feasible on their own (MISR<1), Type 3 technologies that are economically feasible (MISR>1) but do not lead to CO2 fixation on their own (CO2Fix<1), and Type 4 technologies that are neither economically feasible (MISR<1) nor lead to CO2 fixation (CO2Fix<1). Furthermore, the framework enables the estimation of various parameters necessary to determine the economic and CO2 fixation viability of different CCU technologies. Specifically, (a) it allows for the estimation of the minimum subsidy required for a Type 2 CCU conversion technology to become economically feasible, (b) the minimum amount of CO2 capture necessary for a Type 3 technology to become a CO2 fixing technology, (c) the minimum CO2 credit required for a Type 2 technology to become economically feasible, (d) and the maximum CO2 capture cost required for a Type 3 technology to become CO2 fixing while maintaining economic feasibility. By providing these estimates, the framework can assist decision-makers in understanding the potential economic and environmental implications of different CCU technologies, and help in determining the most appropriate course of action for the development and scaling up of these technologies.

We provide a demonstration use of this framework to assess two commonly discussed reactions in the realm of CCU: CO2 hydrogenation to methanol and the dry reforming of methane (DRM). The DRM reaction was assessed to be a Type 3 technology, with a CO2Fix of 0.92 and an MISR of 1.6. Furthermore, it was estimated that for CO2 capture and sequestration cost less than 0.0.08 $/kg-CO2, the technology can be considered a Type 1 technology. At a CO2 capture and sequestration cost of 0.05 $/kg-CO2 the MISR was calculated to be 1.57 at a CO2Fix of 1. The CO2 hydrogenation reaction was assessed to be a Type 2 technology with a CO2Fix of 2 and a MISR of 0.9. The developed framework estimates that the CO2 hydrogenation reaction can be considered a Type 1 technology with a CO2 utilization credit above 0.073 $/kg-CO2. Moreover, at a CO2 utilization credit of 0.1 the reaction has an estimated MISR of 1.02.

The developed framework is a powerful means of quickly screening CCU conversion technologies at early stages of research and development, providing insights on the necessary conditions for the reaction to be economically viable and CO2 fixing. It can also be used to generate early quantitative estimates of the economic and CO2 fixation potential of such reactions for the purpose of comparison and optimization studies.