(106b) Operation and Controls of Operating Direct Methanol Fuel Cells with PVA Based Membranes Modified by Benzimidazolium Groups | AIChE

(106b) Operation and Controls of Operating Direct Methanol Fuel Cells with PVA Based Membranes Modified by Benzimidazolium Groups

Authors 

Kumar, A. - Presenter, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Gajbhiye, P. - Presenter, Indian Institute of Technology
Joshi, P. - Presenter, IIT Kanpur
Singh, J. K. - Presenter, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

In recent years, in an effort to find alternate membrane material (other than Nafion 117), Polybenzimidazole (PBI) membranes have been synthesized where the conducting moiety of this polymer is benzimidazolium groups. The monomers used to synthesize these polymers are bis conjugated amines and diacids are expensive. In this work, we have synthesized grafted polymers of PVA as membrane materials where the grafts are either Poly Acrylic Acid, Poly maleic anhydride (PMA) or Poly Methacrylic acid (PMAA) and these materials were denoted by PVA-g-PAA, PVA-g-PMA, and PVA-g-PMAA. We then synthesized C1, C3 & C4 compounds (formula given at the bottom of Table S1) having bis conjugated amines whereas compound C2 having only one conjugated amine group. One of the steps in synthesizing C1 compound is nitration of phenyl ring, where there is a possibility of formation of two isomers out of which only one of them has strictly bis conjugated amines and can be polymerized with Isophthalic acid giving the formation of PBI. The other byproduct formed is an impurity and is minimized by carrying out the nitration step at low temperature but this cannot be completely removed from the product which is a mixture. Table S1 presents the summary of our experimental results on characterization of membrane, In the C1 to C4 compounds and in some cases (membranes 9, 10, 11), Sulfocuccinic acid were added to the casting polymer solution as additional crosslinking agent in order to achieve higher conductivity. We added the polymer, thus formed, to the casting solution, we first compared the results of the Fuel cell formed by adding C1 (C3 and C4) compound alone and heating at 180°C for some time. Table S1 has two sets of results, one on characterization (columns 1, 2, 3,4,5,6, and 7) of membranes while the other on Fuel cell (columns 8 to 11). For the latter columns 10 and 11 gave results on characterization on Fuel cell while columns 8 and 9 gave results when the Fuel cell was run on control mode for higher efficiency.

            Experiments on membrane pore sizes are given in column 1 which lies between 8.88 to 9.52nm and they all are ultra filtration type. The values of the pore size are mostly governed by the nature of the graft chains, e.g. membranes 1,3,4,7 and 12 consist of PAA grafts and were found to have similar pore sizes. Similarly membranes 2,5,8,9 were of the similar pore size because the PVA have the same grafts of PMA. The next important thing is to determine the wall charges of these membranes and they were estimated by experimentally determining the rejection of Chromic (VI) acid solution through these membranes. Subsequently, a space charge model was proposed for the flow of the solution through their pores and a semi analytical solution was derived for the overall problem of separation of chromic acid solution. We observed that the high surface charge was because of the benzimidazolium groups present on the surface and they ranged from minimum of 465 to maximum of 525mV. The thermal degradation (TGA) experiments were carried out which showed that, through the modification of the polymer by benzimidazole groups, lead to stable membrane and the degradation temperature varies from 150°C for 10% weight loss and for approximately 80% weight reduction, a minimum of 300°C to 700°C.

            The twelve membranes reported in Table S1 were first characterized completely in terms of pore size, wall charge, conductivity, IEC and thermal degradation. In fuel cell applications, higher temperatures give large current density and it is observed that some of the membranes (rows 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 12) could easily be operated upto 150°C without the membrane degrading. However in our case, we insisted that the membrane of direct methanol fuel cell were operated at 90°C for which most of the fuel cell results for Nafion 117 are available. The catalysts used on the anode and cathode side were Pt-Ru and Pt loaded on carbon respectively, which were synthesized by following procedure given in literature. We find that in each case, the power density and the current density were higher and for some of our results (membranes 1,6,12) were atleast two to three times higher than that of Nafion 117 as seen in column 10 and 11. In normal Fuel cell operations, there is decay in the cathode catalyst which is further increased by the methanol crossover. The voltage of the Fuel cell increases, the average volatage gained is reported in column 8 and it is found that the voltage gain depends on the nature of the membrane which is not the same for all of them. In column 9, we have measured the average time cycle and we found that some of the membranes (membranes 6, 7, 9, 10) gave extremely good results.

            It was recognized that the membrane material has hydrophilic PVA matrix and hydrophobic benzimidazolium groups at the surface formed by reaction of the C1 to C4 compounds with grafts (see Fig.S-1). When the reaction occurs (confirmed by IR and NMR), the hydrophobic benzimidazolium are formed which tends to separate as confirmed by the SEM results. In view of this we assumed that the pores of the membrane would have a thin hydrophobic layer with positive charge walls. This is confirmed by the contact angle measurements where the minimum contact angle is 51° and varied upto 89°. Even though most of the polymer matrix is PVA with its grafts, when the ions move through the pores (giving rise to current in Fuel cell), the pore walls get highly charged (as measured by column 2 of Table S1). Some of the membranes have Sulfo succinic acid SSA as part of the matrix (e.g. the membrane 9 to 11) which would tend to give sulfonate groups inside the PVA matrix as well as at the phase boundaries, this way giving rise to bipolar nature of the membrane (benzimidazolium group being strictly cationic in nature). In addition to this, some of the compounds such as C1 and C2 compounds have bonded sulfonate groups which would give the positive and negative charge separated by the molecular distance, once again producing a bipolar nature to the membrane. In remainder of the cases the charges would be induced on the phase boundaries as seen in Fig.S-1.  The conductivity observed in our membranes is very high and could be attributed to the special bipolar structure of our polymers.


Table S1. Fuel cell and Membrane Characterization

Compound

Membrane

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

MWCO

(pore size,

nm)

Wall Charge

Conductivity

(S/cm)

 

IEC

Thermal

Degradation

temp (°C)

10%               80%

Water

Uptake

Contact

Angle

Average Voltage

Gain      (V)

Average

 time

cycle

(min)

Power

Density

(mW/

cm²)

Current

Density

(mA/

cm²)

C1

1

PVA-g-PAA-C1

9.1

488

0.04

2.7

199.732

268.70

7.5

72

0.523

55.75

50.47

74.88

2

PVA-g-PMA-C1

9.35

465

1.23 x10-2

1.8

142.659

447.6

10.691

74.917

0.568

42.896

0.305

3.81

3

PVA-g-PAA-modified

9.52

488

1.51 x10-2

2.12

115.123

706.53

(28.93%)

13.665

75.581

0.778

69.85

37.37

64.44

C2

4

PVA-g-PAA-C2

9.52

525

6.59 x10-2

2.38

119.558

691.93

13.4

51.2

0.704

39.83

23.0020

50.55

5

PVA-g-PMA-C2

9.36

519

1.04 x10-2

2.17

181.59

562.348

14.9

50.24

0.77

161.93

34.72

62.11

6

PVA-g-PMAA-C2

8.99

482

1.16 x10-2

2.18

201.055

472.568

13.8

51.8

0.6066

147.81

76.72

92.33

C3

7

PVA-g-PAA-C3

9.0

512

2.51 x10-2

2.23

204.908

453.03

8.624

70.368

0.6883

82.55

36.397

75

8

PVA-g-PMA-C3

9.5

510

3.51 x10-2

2.27

166.819

505.293

13.513

62.944

0.726

37.557

36.11

64.381

9

PVA-g-PAA-SSA-C3

9.36

497

1.71 x10-2

2.51

154.914

813.769

(24.32%)

10.5

54.8

0.8096

99.423

23.45

57.778

10

PVA-g-PMA-SSA-C3

9.83

480

2.28 x10-2

2.46

115.12

428.713

8.5

76.2

0.663

224.22

28.561

58.358

11

PVA-g-PMAA-SSA-C3

8.88

525

3.66 x10-2

1.85

139.772

681.715

(30.78%)

7.2

89.2

0.77

18.36

20.832

48.11

C4

12

PVA-g-PAA-C4

9.5

495

2.56 x10-2

1.62

189.87

451.86

8.927

59.132

0.704

74.19

41.1

71

13

Nafion 117

0.1

21.01

48.33

Compound C1, [Bis-3-Amino-4-{3-(triethylammoniumsulfonato) phenylamino}-phenyl sulfone] hydrochloride  

Compound C3, Bis -4 [1, 2 diamino phenyl]-phenyl sulfone) hydrochloride

Compound C2, 3-Amino -4-[3-(triethyl ammonium sulfonato) phenyl amino]  phenylene hydrochloride

Compound C4, 1, 4 [1, 2 diamino phenyl] Phenylene hydrochloride  


  Figure S-1. The bipolar nature of PVA-g-PAA-BASPAPS membrane which reduces the methanol crossover due to the molecular dissociation. In (a), the imidazolium group is shown to separate out from the PVA moiety of the chain into a separate phase. In (b), the water is shown to complex with the SO₂ and the imidazolium group. As a result of this, interaction in (d) and (e), the water and the methanol is shown to split into anion and cation and the anion permeates through the membrane giving bipolar effect