(152b) Flare Operation with Low MFR | AIChE

(152b) Flare Operation with Low MFR

Authors 

Karstensen, D. - Presenter, Lyondell Basell
Hatch, M. - Presenter, Lyondell Basell
Garcia, A. - Presenter, Lyondell Basell

Flare Operation with Low
MFR Abstract:

By:  Alejandra Garcia, Marcus Hatch and Denise Karstensen

Flares are process safety systems utilized at many
manufacturing sites. ?The primary function of a flare is to use combustion to
convert flammable, toxic or corrosive vapors to less objectionable compounds.?
(API 521 paragraph 6.4.1).  A secondary function of a flare is as an air
pollution control device.  The long standing assumption was that if the flare
was operated in accordance with 40 CFR 60.18 (>300 Btu/scf, smokeless, max
exit velocity), it was achieving acceptable combustion efficiency.  The primary
focus has been to prevent smoke, which is usually suppressed with steam.  The
2010 TCEQ Flare Study, in which USEPA participated, provided evidence that over
steaming a flare educts excess air into the combustion zone that can impact
combustion efficiency.  The 2010 TCEQ Flare Study also indicated that there was
little correlation between destruction efficiency and smoking; some of the
highest destruction efficiencies were found with smoking flares.  Nevertheless,
minimizing smoke is one of the explicit requirements of 40 CFR 60.18.

With USEPA's national enforcement initiative on air toxics
focusing on flare operation, flare operators should assess whether additional
parameters need to be addressed. EPA's enforcement office takes the position
that operating in compliance with 40 CFR 60.18 may not be sufficient to meet
>98% destruction efficiency if the steam to flare gas ratio is excessive. 
While olefins plant flares are designed for high flow rates associated with
process upsets, they typically operate at vent gas flow rates of <1% of
design capacity while maintaining steam  assist rates intended to protect the
integrity of the flare tip and prevent smoking.   These conditions may result
in ?steam to vent gas ratios? higher than identified in the 2012 EPA guidance on
?Parameters for Properly Designed and Operated Flares?.  The challenge is in
maintaining appropriate combustion efficiencies with high turndown, low flow
hydrocarbon rates.   

A project was installed to improve measurement and control
of the steam to hydrocarbon ratio to the flare combustion zone. Equipment
design challenges included accurate steam flow measurement and control, as well
as accurate vent gas flow and composition measurement. Plants in colder
climates pose the additional challenge of getting good steam quality to the tip
to mitigate tip icing.  This paper provides the improvements implemented and
the results achieved.

Checkout

This paper has an Extended Abstract file available; you must purchase the conference proceedings to access it.

Checkout

Do you already own this?

Pricing

Individuals

2014 Spring Meeting & 10th Global Congress on Process Safety
AIChE Pro Members $150.00
AIChE Graduate Student Members Free
AIChE Undergraduate Student Members Free
AIChE Explorer Members $225.00
Non-Members $225.00
The 26th Ethylene Producers’ Conference only
AIChE Pro Members $100.00
Fuels and Petrochemicals Division Members Free
AIChE Graduate Student Members Free
AIChE Undergraduate Student Members Free
AIChE Explorer Members $150.00
Non-Members $150.00