(161d) Details Matter When Designing Hot Vapor Bypasses
AIChE Spring Meeting and Global Congress on Process Safety
2017
2017 Spring Meeting and 13th Global Congress on Process Safety
Kister Distillation Symposium
Kister Distillation Symposium 2017: Distillation Troubleshooting and Controls: Lessons Learned
Wednesday, March 29, 2017 - 9:35am to 10:05am
In 2014, the unit was upgraded to improve operating margins with changes to the unit design. Modifications were completed in the feed system, a reactor was added, and major changes in the fractionation system. Fractionator changes included changes to improve capacity and fractionation efficiency to handle the new product slates. As part of the revamp, additional heat removal was added to the condenser circuit that increased the capacity by over 50%.
After startup, it was apparent that the hot vapor bypass system was not operating as designed. Primary fractionator pressure control was unstable, along with major process fluctuations in circuit temperatures and drum level. The instability was severe enough that the refinery considered a shutdown of the newly re-started hydrocracker to avoid potential equipment damage.
Field troubleshooting identified the problems with the overhead drum design which resulted in hot vapor bypass instabilities with a highly subcooled system. After identification, the overhead trim condenser duty was reduced by reducing water flow to limit subcooling. This eliminated the instability until a pad gas system was installed.
The author will present operating data that substantiates a previously unseen phenomena with hot vapor bypass pressure control configurations. Design parameters and recommendations will be made to improve future hot vapor bypass system designs.