(55ah) Consequence Assessments and Collaboration to Streamline Project Siting | AIChE

(55ah) Consequence Assessments and Collaboration to Streamline Project Siting

Authors 

Bylhouwer, B. - Presenter, Stantec Consulting ltd.
Springer, A., Stantec Consulting Ltd.
Wierzba, P., Stantec Consulting Ltd.
Collaboration is often sought after across disciplines, but all too often disregarded in favour of linear project development. For siting and consequence, as with other areas where design interacts with environment, health and safety constraints, this often leads to more costly design due to increased project iterations.

Stantec recently completed a consequence assessment for a compressor station to assess flammable extents during an emergency blowdown. At the same time, the client was experiencing siting issues due to sound emissions from the same process. The facility was grappling with competing factors: blowdown the facility in time to avoid catastrophic failure of their infrastructure, avoid excessive flammability extents from the blowdown stack location, and avoid extraneous noise exposure to nearby receptors. Using transient consequence modelling tools to model the blowdown sequence, Stantec was able to simultaneously and efficiently assess the flammable extents and sound emissions from the blowdown operations.

Consequence modelling for flammability was completed using a transient pipeline blowdown modelling tool to simulate the mass, energy, and momentum throughout the pipeline system. The model first simulated normal operating conditions, and then simulated the blowdown to estimate mass flow rate, liquid mass fraction, and release temperature from the blowdown stack. Several sizes of reducers upstream of the blowdown stack were introduced to estimate the pressure drops in the piping that would be required to appropriately reduce noise levels but also achieve full depressurization of the facility in time to meet safety criteria.

Consequence modelling of flammability was completed using SLAB, while the predicted change in sound pressure level from the blowdown stack was completed using Cadna acoustic modelling software. By combining these two analyses, the assessment costs streamlined for both required studies. In addition, the acoustics study benefited from additional insight provided by the consequence modelling tool.