Advances on the Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Reactivity on Lithium and Sodium Ceramics and Its Catalytic Conversion to Added Value Products | AIChE

Advances on the Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Reactivity on Lithium and Sodium Ceramics and Its Catalytic Conversion to Added Value Products

Authors 

Pfeiffer, H. - Presenter, Instituto de Investigaciones en Materiales, UNAM

The anthropogenic amounts of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere have been raised dramatically, mainly due to the combustion of different carbonaceous materials used in energy production, transport and other important industries such as cement production, iron and steelmaking. To solve or mitigate, at least, this environmental problem, several alternatives have been proposed. A promising alternative for reducing the CO2 emissions is to capture and concentrate the gas and its subsequent chemical transformation.

Different materials have been proposed as potential CO2 captors. Among these materials, different lithium and sodium ceramics have been proposed as possible high temperature CO2 captors. Some of the alkaline ceramics most studied are the lithium and sodium silicates (Li4SiO4, Li8SiO6, Li2SiO3 and Na2SiO3), lithium aluminate (Li5AlO4) lithium and sodium zirconates (Li2ZrO3 and Na2ZrO3) and lithium cuprate (Li2CuO2), among others. All these ceramics have been tested, producing interesting results at different temperature ranges between 30 and 700 °C.

In this kind of ceramics CO2 capture is produced throughout a chemisorption process. Initially, the alkaline ceramic particles react with CO2 at the surface. The superficial reaction implies the formation of an external shell of Li2CO3 or Na2CO3 and secondary phases. Once the external shell is produced, the reaction mechanism is controlled by different diffusion processes. Therefore, the correct understanding of all these phenomena is a very important step during the selection of the ideal CO2 capture conditions. In other words, the selection of materials, temperature range, gas and/or vapor concentrations, flows, etc. Then, the aim of this work is to present different experiments related to the CO2 reactivity, chemisorption, on lithium and sodium ceramics and to propose how different factors control this process. The work will be focused on diffusion controlled CO2 chemisorption, which has been shown to be the limiting step of the CO2 chemisorption process. Diffusion controlled CO2 chemisorption appears to be mainly influenced by the chemical composition of a product’s external shell.

Conversely, different catalytic reactions, where carbon dioxide (CO2) and/or methane (CH4) are used, have attracted the research attention because of environmental applications. Some of these reactions are the methane reforming (called dry reforming), the water splitting and the CO2 reduction. All these reactions produce syngas (CO + H2). The syngas produced by these reactions can be used in different energetic and organic applications. Additionally, these reactions are also environmentally important, as CO2 and CH4 (perhaps the two most important greenhouse gases) are catalytically converted into added value products, such as hydrocarbons and oxygenated compounds.

Therefore, the aim of this presentation is to show some new advances in the CO2 capture on alkaline ceramics and to show as well how the CO2 chemically trapped can be catalyzed to added value products through the syngas production at different temperature ranges.

References:

[1] J. Ortiz-Landeros, T. Ávalos-Rendón, C. Gómez-Yáñez, H. Pfeiffer, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 108 (2012) 647.

[2] S. Choi, J. H. Drese, C. W. Jones, ChemSusChem, 2 (2009) 796.

[3] H. Pfeiffer, Advances in CO2 Conversion and Utilization, Chapter 15, ACS ed., 1056 (2010) 233.

[4] H. A. Mosqueda-Altamirano, C. Vazquez, P. Bosch, H. Pfeiffer, Chem. Mater., 18 (2006) 2307.

[5] K. Nakagawa, T. Ohashi, J. Electrochem. Soc., 145 (1998) 1344.

[6] B. N. Nair, R. P. Burwood, V. J. Goh, K. Nakagawa, T. Yamaguchi, Prog. Mater. Sci., 54 (2009) 511.

[7] P.D.F. Vernon, M.L.H. Green, A.K. Cheetham, A.T. Ashcrof, Catal. Today 13 (1992) 417–426.

[8] L. Sun, Y. Tan, Q. Zhang, H. Xie, Y. Han, Inter. J. Hydrogen Ener. 36 (2011) 12259–12267.

[9] V. Subramani, S. K. Gangwal, Ener. Fuels 22 (2008) 814–839.

Checkout

This paper has an Extended Abstract file available; you must purchase the conference proceedings to access it.

Checkout

Do you already own this?

Pricing

Individuals

AIChE Explorer Members $95.00
Non-Members $95.00