(312g) Velocity Distribution for Flow in Porous Media
AIChE Annual Meeting
2021
2021 Annual Meeting
Engineering Sciences and Fundamentals
Fundamental Research in Transport Processes
Tuesday, November 9, 2021 - 2:00pm to 2:15pm
In this work, we investigated the three-dimensional velocity distributions of flow through the open space of porous media consisting of sphere packings and scaffolds with different configurations. The sphere packings were simple cubic (SC), body-centered cubic (BCC), face-centered cubic (FCC), randomly packed mono-disperse spheres, randomly packed bi-disperse spheres and tri-disperse sphere packing. Moreover, flow through a fiber scaffold in two different directions and flow through foam scaffolds are examined. Our intention was to find a common form of a statistical distribution that fitted the velocity distribution in various types of porous media. The flow of water through these porous media configurations was simulated by the Lattice Boltzmann method (LBM), which was carefully validated with analytical solutions [1]-[4]. Moreover, the velocity distribution of the flow through randomly packed spheres was validated against experimental results [5]. The velocity fields gained from the LBM method were normalized by the mean pore velocity and the probability density function (pdf) that resulted in each case was calculated. In addition, Kolgomorov-Smirnov (KS) goodness-of-fit tests were utilized to examine whether the velocity distributions followed any well-known forms of pdfs. These tests were performed on the software EASYFIT version 5.6. As a result, the Weibull distribution was found to well describe the distribution of dimensionless velocity magnitude in the examined porous types. However, velocity distributions in SC, BCC and FCC were represented by three different Weibull equations. On the contrary, there was one Weibull form could fit the velocity distributions in the remaining geometries. This observation relates to the differences in pore size distributions, which were analyzed by two methods including watershed methods and maximal ball techniques. The pore size distributions in the structured geometries (SC, BCC and FCC) shown by both methods appeared to be intermittent (i.e., discrete) while the rest were continuous.
It is therefore possible to predict a-priori the distribution of fluid velocities in a typical porous medium when one knows the mean pore velocity and utilizes a Weibull probability density function.
REFERENCES
[1] R. Voronov, S. VanGordon, V. I. Sikavitsas, and D. V. Papavassiliou, âComputational modeling of flow-induced shear stresses within 3D salt-leached porous scaffolds imaged via micro-CT,â J. Biomech., vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 1279â1286, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.01.007.
[2] R. S. Voronov, S. B. VanGordon, V. I. Sikavitsas, and D. V. Papavassiliou, âEfficient Lagrangian scalar tracking method for reactive local mass transport simulation through porous media,â Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 501â517, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.1002/fld.2369.
[3] N. H. Pham, R. S. Voronov, N. R. Tummala, and D. V. Papavassiliou, âBulk stress distributions in the pore space of sphere-packed beds under Darcy flow conditions,â Phys. Rev. E - Stat. Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys., vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 1â13, 2014, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.89.033016.
[4] V. Nguyen, V. and D.V. Papavassiliou, âHydrodynamic Dispersion in Porous Media and the Significance of Lagrangian Time and Space Scales,â Fluids, vol 5, no 22, Art 79, (21 pages) 2020; doi: 10.3390/fluids5020079
[5] M. Souzy, H. Lhuissier, Y. Méheust, T. Le Borgne, and B. Metzger, âVelocity distributions, dispersion and stretching in three-dimensional porous media,â J. Fluid Mech., 2020, doi: 10.1017/jfm.2020.113.