(183g) Enhancing Capillary Evaporation for Advanced Heat Transfer Applications with PbTe Nanoparticle Coating Layer
AIChE Annual Meeting
2024
2024 AIChE Annual Meeting
Nanoscale Science and Engineering Forum
Poster Session: NSEF Graduate Student Poster Competition
Monday, October 28, 2024 - 3:30pm to 5:00pm
To analyze evaporation rates, 10 µL of super wetting solutions acetone, ethanol, and n-heptane were dispensed onto various surfaces, including a copper sheet (Copper), a PbTe dip-coated layer on copper (PbTe), a PbTe layer with DEZ treatment (PbTe with DEZ), and a PbTe layer with hydrazine treatment (PbTe with Hydrazine). The average evaporation rates for acetone were 0.273 µL/s on Copper, 0.434 µL/s on PbTe, 0.476 µL/s on PbTe with DEZ, and 0.526 µL/s on PbTe with Hydrazine. For ethanol, the rates were 0.0615 µL/s, 0.148 µL/s, 0.160 µL/s, and 0.190 µL/s, respectively. For n-heptane, they were 0.116 µL/s, 0.128 µL/s, 0.172 µL/s, and 0.217 µL/s, respectively. The evaporation rate of all solutions increased in the order of Copper, PbTe, PbTe with DEZ, and PbTe with Hydrazine. Overall, the evaporation rate compared to Copper increased from 10.3% to 209%.
To investigate the hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity of each Copper, PbTe, PbTe with DEZ, and PbTe with Hydrazine surface, a 0.5 µL droplet of DI water was applied to each surface and the contact angle in the equilibrium state was measured. The contact angle in the equilibrium state was 67° for copper, 95° for PbTe, 91° for PbTe with DEZ, and 70° for PbTe with Hydrazine. Subsequently, the evaporation rate was recorded. For the copper sheet, it declined from an initial rate of 0.707 nL/s to 0.226 nL/s at the conclusion of evaporation, indicating a 68.0% reduction. In contrast, the evaporation rate for PbTe began at 0.658 nL/s and decreased to 0.329 nL/s, resulting in a 46% reduction. For PbTe with DEZ treatment, the rate dropped from 0.609 nL/s to 0.418 nL/s, a 31.4% decrease. The PbTe with Hydrazine surface experienced a decline from 0.773 nL/s to 0.475 nL/s, amounting to a 38.6% reduction. However, due to the higher absolute evaporation rate on this surface, evaporation was completed more swiftly than on the other surfaces.