(124c) Use of Water Hammer to Mitigate Membrane Fouling in Ultrafiltration. | AIChE

(124c) Use of Water Hammer to Mitigate Membrane Fouling in Ultrafiltration.

Authors 

Aslam, M., Khalifa University
Farid, M., University of Auckland
Wong, A., University of Auckland
Fouling is an endemic problem in ultrafiltration as well as other membrane separation and concentration processes. Recently water-hammer pulsing has been shown to reduce membrane fouling in both ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis [1,2,3,4]. Rapid solenoid-valve closure on the retentate or permeate side of a membrane generates a pressure front that propagates and reflects at the system boundaries at the speed-of-sound in the system. However, the mechanism whereby this mitigation occurs is not well-understood; as such, a predictive model is lacking to permit scaleup of this process. In this paper a mathematical model is advanced for mitigating fouling using pulsed solenoid-valve closure in the ultrafiltration of particulates. The model assumes the boundary-layer flow that develops after the first pressure-front reflection at the upstream boundary causes a significantly enhanced shear stress on the fouled membrane. This increased shear stress typically occurs for less than one-hundredth of a second during each solenoid-valve closure that occurs once every several seconds. However, it has a significant effect on removing the fouling deposits because it is orders-of-magnitude larger than the shear stress of the steady state crossflow velocity. Figure 1 shows a plot of the fractional permeation flux increase for 44 experiments as a function of a dimensionless group that incorporates the range of fluxes, foulant concentrations, pressures, and solenoid-valve-closure frequencies for concentrating an aqueous whey-protein feed. The average experiment error is 6.96% and the Coefficient-of-Determination for the model fit to these 44 data is 0.997. The fractional permeation flux increase ranged between 10.7% and 124% with an average increase of 51.2%. However, the model indicates that higher fractional permeation flux increases are possible if a solenoid valve is used that can be pulsed at higher frequencies.

[1] F. Broens, D. Menne, I. Pothof, B. Blankert, H.D.W. Roesink, H. Futselaar, R.G.H. Lammertink, M. Wessling, Water hammer reduces fouling during natural water ultrafiltration, Water Res. 46(4) (2012) 1113–1120.

[2] B. Liberman, L. Eshed, G. Greenberg, Pulse Flow RO - The new RO technology for waste and brackish water applications, Desalination 479 (2020) 114336.

[3] M. Aslam, F. Wicaksana, M. Farid, A. Wong, W.B. Krantz, Mitigation of membrane fouling by whey protein via water hammer, J. Membr. Sci. 642 (2022) 119967.

[4] W.B. Krantz, F. Wicaksana, M. Aslam, A. Wong, M.Farid, Development and validation of a model for mitigating particulate fouling in ultrafiltration using water-hammer, J. Membr. Sci. 666 (2023) 121098.